Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

possible port of orange box?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by deanjo View Post
    It would in effect pretty much kill crossover's game version of their product.
    Of course if everything started coming out in a native client I can't say I would shed a tear to see Wine die a quick death.
    I don't know. There are a LOT of people that use wine for things other than gaming (though that seems to be its greater use). Plus there's the immense number of older games that aren't and won't be available through Steam, that use DirectX 9 and 10, other applications (modeling software, visualization software, etc) that also rely on DirectX technology to function properly, etc. Wine could actually GROW once and for all and stop playing catch up with the games, and instead focusing in more important parts (like proper GDI+ implementation, Aero implementation [for when an application requires it, and map that to AIGLX and Compiz, for instance], and many many more compatibility fixes, etc.).

    Steam on Linux (with a nice share of games) would also mean one crucial thing: Linux is a viable alternative to Windows, and may even benefit more console porting than Windows. OpenGL development for the games would instantly mean virtually insignificant effort to port to Mac, small effort to port to Wii and PS3, and even Windows ports. Microsoft-centric development, even if the platform supports OpenGL, has been focused on DirectX, which only translates into Xbox portability. OpenGL actually opens up a broader audience, and can even cater the most widely used OS in the market: Windows, which needless to say, if I were a gaming company manager, would be a no brainer to migrate development and training. The investments made to migrate the underlying API of the games, most likely will be made up for if it is available on more platforms than two.

    Comment


    • #22
      Please don't forget that fglrx/Catalyst + wine = major failure. Don't even try to play recent games with it (or CSS with DX8/DX9 render).

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Malikith View Post
        Yeah but if Wine's Directx 9 support matures, then we can pretty much kiss any chances of alot of ports to Linux bye bye. They'll just tell us "Go use Wine, stop bothering us." when we ask them for a port. So basically, Wine would potentially kill gaming on Linux.
        I don't think that's true. If they actually said that, then wine would become a supported platform for running their game. And that would bring most of the advantages of having a native client.

        Also, there are a few things that will never be supported under wine, such as punkbuster. It's just not possible right now to play on punkbuster servers for many games, such as call of duty 4.

        Finally, a native opengl app is always going to be faster than one that goes through wine's directx translation layer. So there will still be reasons to bring native clients to linux.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by etymxris View Post
          I don't think that's true. If they actually said that, then wine would become a supported platform for running their game. And that would bring most of the advantages of having a native client.

          Also, there are a few things that will never be supported under wine, such as punkbuster. It's just not possible right now to play on punkbuster servers for many games, such as call of duty 4.

          Finally, a native opengl app is always going to be faster than one that goes through wine's directx translation layer. So there will still be reasons to bring native clients to linux.
          And that is why i dont like punkbuster.

          Comment

          Working...
          X