Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 71

Thread: Apple's OS X Launchd Being Ported To FreeBSD

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,620

    Default Apple's OS X Launchd Being Ported To FreeBSD

    Phoronix: Apple's OS X Launchd Being Ported To FreeBSD

    There is new work within the FreeBSD camp to port Apple's launchd from OS X to non-Darwin systems...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTU0NjQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,027

    Default

    Wonder if they'll port to OpenBSD, NetBSD, DragonFly BSD too?
    Perhaps even Linux?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    781

    Default

    Isn't launchd like systemD? If so, why not port the latter since Gnome and probably soon other software will depend on systemD?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    64

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mark45 View Post
    Isn't launchd like systemD? If so, why not port the latter since Gnome and probably soon other software will depend on systemD?
    Because systemd is at the moment (and probably will ever be) Linux-only and is also licensed GPL (LGPL v2.1). "launchd" on the other hand is taylored for a BSD-style system (OS X) and is "Apache License" licensed. The latter is much more preferable for FreeBSD. Remember FreeBSD ditched GCC in favour of LLVM mainly because of the license.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    684

    Default

    AFIK systemD was developed because launchd couldn't coexist with legacy sysV init (and they didn't like Upstart), so porting it to FreeBSD could turn out to be a major task.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    742

    Default

    Good since FreeBSDs current init system sucks monkey balls. It's the most slow thing I have ever used in my life. You totally forget that you have a SATA 3 SSD installed. My Arch Linux installation is able to boot faster than FreeBSDs init is able to set the hostname. I'm not kidding.

    It's systemd btw not Sytemd or SystemD or systemD.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Could this be the break Debian needs in relation to their init system conundrum with kFreeBSD as a Debian variant?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    607

    Default

    So, sysv init is now a bad guy for bsd?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,287

    Default

    Good news for the BSD guys

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    438

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glasen View Post
    Because systemd is at the moment (and probably will ever be) Linux-only and is also licensed GPL (LGPL v2.1). "launchd" on the other hand is taylored for a BSD-style system (OS X) and is "Apache License" licensed. The latter is much more preferable for FreeBSD. Remember FreeBSD ditched GCC in favour of LLVM mainly because of the license.
    It was about control, license restrictions and design goals.

    The world is better off with LLVM/Clang in it. It's what has gotten GCC to evolve.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •