Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: 27-Way NVIDIA & AMD Graphics Card Benchmarks On Linux

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,102

    Default 27-Way NVIDIA & AMD Graphics Card Benchmarks On Linux

    Phoronix: 27-Way NVIDIA & AMD Graphics Card Benchmarks On Linux

    After last week delivering a 21-way graphics card comparison on Linux using the open-source Intel, Radeon, and NVIDIA (Nouveau) graphics drivers, this week at Phoronix we have a 27-way graphics card. This time around all of the graphics cards were tested using the closed-source/proprietary AMD Catalyst and NVIDIA graphics drivers.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19429

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Have you tried this for fglrx-legacy: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.p...23425#poststop ?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    353

    Default

    tl;dr
    $320 gtx 770 performing 20-30%+ better than $410 r9 290
    $240 gtx 760 performing +/- 5% of 290

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    325

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peppercats View Post
    tl;dr
    $320 gtx 770 performing 20-30%+ better than $410 r9 290
    $240 gtx 760 performing +/- 5% of 290
    did you compare the 4GB RAM versions of both cards?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Ok, so the 770 looks like the best buy right now for a higher end card on Linux.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    7

    Default opencl benchmark

    Nice work Michael!

    It would be nice to see luxmark benchmark in the list too.
    It's a very important opencl benchmark to show the gpu power.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tomtomme View Post
    did you compare the 4GB RAM versions of both cards?
    Does it seem to make a difference in performance?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by extraymond View Post
    It would be nice to see luxmark benchmark in the list too.
    It's a very important opencl benchmark to show the gpu power.
    That would be one benchmark running a fairly static function. All you would have is an indicator of it's "gpu power" for luxmark and nothing more. That's just a little better then using glxgears to show openGL performance.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    That would be one benchmark running a fairly static function. All you would have is an indicator of it's "gpu power" for luxmark and nothing more. That's just a little better then using glxgears to show openGL performance.
    As long as we can have luxmark result, I really don't mind the form to display it <3
    I'm thinking luxmark cos that is one remarkable benchmark people can have to imagine performance like bitcoin or opencl rendering and so on.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Thanks Michael for this great testing. Hopefully next time we can the Performance-per-Watt comparison, too.

    For a owner of R9 270X as me, I'm not very concern about Catalyst gaming performance now.

    As benchmarks show, Catalyst clearly either hits a cap or has a huge gap behind GeForce.
    But as long as it's still sits above 60FPS, it won't affect real world game experience much.

    Surely it also sits behind in all Unigine powered benchmark AND below 60FPS.
    Well, I can easily low GFX setting a bit in Oil Rush to reach 60FPS, which is the only Unigine powered native Linux game I have.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •