Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Thread: 21-Way Open-Source AMD/Intel/NVIDIA GPU Benchmarks On Linux

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,371

    Default 21-Way Open-Source AMD/Intel/NVIDIA GPU Benchmarks On Linux

    Phoronix: 21-Way Open-Source AMD/Intel/NVIDIA GPU Benchmarks On Linux

    If you are hoping to snag some deals on computer hardware this holiday shopping season, for helping guide you in any graphics card purchases are a fresh round of benchmarks of 21 different graphics processors from the Intel HD Graphics, AMD Radeon, and NVIDIA GeForce families tested on their respective open-source Linux graphics drivers.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19400

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    9

    Default

    I'm very happy to read this. I'm getting a used 6870 from a friend, and it seems that I won't have to use the proprietary drivers.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    58

    Default

    why is radeon hd 6450 too slow?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    542

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pali View Post
    why is radeon hd 6450 too slow?
    It's a rebrand of an HD 5450, which is also very slow due to its hardware (low bandwidth and GPU power).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    821

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Calinou View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pali View Post
    why is radeon hd 6450 too slow?
    It's a rebrand of an HD 5450, which is also very slow due to its hardware (low bandwidth and GPU power).
    Not quite, the 5450(Cedar) was rebranded to 6350 and marketed only to OEMs. The 6450(Caicos) was an entirely new part with 160SP vs. 80SP in the 5450.

    But it is very low-end and has little memory bandwidth, so the low scores are unsurprising (the proprietary driver is somewhat faster though).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    399

    Default

    If you plan to buy a graphics card this holiday season for use with open-source drivers exclusively, I would highly recommend the AMD Radeon HD 6000 series graphics cards for maximum performance.
    Well, the problem with that is that it's impossible to get a hold of a (new) 59xx/68xx/69xx card, since ATI has pulled them all off the shelf. The only cards available from the older generations are low-end cards, I guess so you have to either buy something low-end or something new and expensive. There are some shady online shops that still sell them, but I wouldn't order from those places.
    I really don't have an economical issue with buying a new shiny high-end card, but since I'm only using FOSS drivers, it would be a huge waste of money, and I would get worse performance than from an older and cheaper card.

    Edit: Wait, I found one "slightly used, in good condition" in one shop! Hurrah!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    399

    Default

    I just found 3 "slightly used" HD6970 2GB ($350), 7870 OC 2GB ($230) and a HD7950 3GB DCII TOP OC ($387).. The 7870 is most bang-for-the-buck I guess? But in the foreseeable future, the 7950 is probably worth the extra 150 bucks, right? It feels like even though the 6970 is the best card according to Phoronix testing today, the 7xxx series will soon surpass it in performance.
    (cross post from LLVM thread, I thought it is probably more on-topic here...)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Azpegath View Post
    I just found 3 "slightly used" HD6970 2GB ($350), 7870 OC 2GB ($230) and a HD7950 3GB DCII TOP OC ($387).. The 7870 is most bang-for-the-buck I guess? But in the foreseeable future, the 7950 is probably worth the extra 150 bucks, right? It feels like even though the 6970 is the best card according to Phoronix testing today, the 7xxx series will soon surpass it in performance.
    (cross post from LLVM thread, I thought it is probably more on-topic here...)
    The higher-end 7000 series shares cores with low end R7/R9's. Improvements to RadeonSI will improve both. It's only Sea Islands (Hawaii - R9 290, 290X) which are completely buggered at the moment.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    france
    Posts
    55

    Thumbs up

    good test, pretty interesting
    but I would like some HD 5xxx in this test

    R7 270x is uselless because it's a 7870 "rebranded " (and there are allready a 78xx card in this test)

    HD Graphic 4600 run well .

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    265

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Azpegath View Post
    I just found 3 "slightly used" HD6970 2GB ($350), 7870 OC 2GB ($230) and a HD7950 3GB DCII TOP OC ($387).. The 7870 is most bang-for-the-buck I guess? But in the foreseeable future, the 7950 is probably worth the extra 150 bucks, right? It feels like even though the 6970 is the best card according to Phoronix testing today, the 7xxx series will soon surpass it in performance.
    (cross post from LLVM thread, I thought it is probably more on-topic here...)
    As hardware goes they are ranked 7870, 6970, 7950. So the pricing is pretty good at mirroring the performance.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •