Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 103

Thread: NVIDIA, Mentor Graphics May Harm GCC

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,359

    Default NVIDIA, Mentor Graphics May Harm GCC

    Phoronix: NVIDIA, Mentor Graphics May Harm GCC

    Yesterday there was news that OpenACC 2.0 parallel programming support was coming to GCC complete with GPU acceleration support for NVIDIA GPUs. While it was exciting on the surface, it appears that this work may be poisonous and could have a very tough time making it upstream...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTUxNjM

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Linus doing his thing to Nvidia is, once again, relevant.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,442

    Default

    Uhh oh. Just days after NVIDIA sends Michael a few thousand bucks worth of high-end GPUs, already he's sailing them down the river with this kind of FUD.

    I can't even tell what, exactly, has this "trusted contact"'s panties all bunched up.


    And the comment about Nouveau was especially amusing. Who would use that driver for OpenACC and CUDA work? Who thinks this stuff up?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    72

    Cool

    RMS: nVidia puts its hands on gcc? nVidia ...

    p.s. it's not photoshop.... it's mspaint

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by johnc View Post
    Uhh oh. Just days after NVIDIA sends Michael a few thousand bucks worth of high-end GPUs, already he's sailing them down the river with this kind of FUD.
    You sound disappointed he didn't understand your "present" was a bribe!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,442

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carewolf View Post
    You sound disappointed he didn't understand your "present" was a bribe!!
    If it was legitimate criticism you would have a point. This is just "let's try to stir a shitstorm."

    It reminds me of that one story everyone runs around and loves to quote, about how NVIDIA lost a big deal in China and AMD won it because they have open drivers... and yet there isn't a single shred of factual evidence to actually support the story. (Like, maybe, an AMD SEC filing indicating massive income?)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    763

    Default

    Reminds me of this anonymous leak.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    53

    Default

    Well, it was a mistake to send any hardware to a shameless Michael Larabel, he repays in kind by backstabbing Nvidia with lies from "trusted source". BULLSHIT. Michael Larabel, please return all of Nvidia's GeForce 700 cards, you don't deserve to test or benchmark them, period.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by johnc View Post
    I can't even tell what, exactly, has this "trusted contact"'s panties all bunched up.
    I know you are just trying to troll as per usual but I will answer as if you were making a serious comment. It's pretty clear from the post that the worry is gcc will be relying an underlying proprietary closed source system which gcc has no control over. This type of arrangement pretty much always ends up screwing over the open system sometime in the future, undocumented futures, unfixable bugs, totally dropping the assembly language from the binary driver in favour of some new wizz bad thing are just some things that pop to mind that could be a concern to gcc relying on this.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GT220 View Post
    Well, it was a mistake to send any hardware to a shameless Michael Larabel, he repays in kind by backstabbing Nvidia with lies from "trusted source". BULLSHIT. Michael Larabel, please return all of Nvidia's GeForce 700 cards, you don't deserve to test or benchmark them, period.
    So do you have a source that this is not true? I'm assuming it should be pretty easy to confirm.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •