Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Nouveau Performance Is Faster With Linux 3.12

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,619

    Default Nouveau Performance Is Faster With Linux 3.12

    Phoronix: Nouveau Performance Is Faster With Linux 3.12

    In following the AMD Radeon performance is incredible on Linux 3.12 article that benchmarked ten different AMD graphics cards on the Linux kernel, followed by the reason why AMD Radeon graphics are faster on Linux 3.12, here's now some benchmarks of the open-source NVIDIA driver with GeForce graphics cards. The testing in this article is a few NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards with the Nouveau driver when comparing the Linux 3.11 and 3.12 kernels in a similar fashion to the AMD Linux OpenGL performance testing. Like the AMD results, there are some notable gains to find with the yet-to-be-released 3.12 kernel.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19215

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    62

    Default

    If you're GPU is stuck running at a low clock-speed or you have a slow graphics processor to begin with
    Should be corrected.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    632

    Default

    From the article:

    Up next in my Linux 3.12 kernel performance investigation will likely be binary driver tests and power consumption monitoring.
    Very interesting indeed.
    Lat time I checked (~year ago), 'ondemand' had, err, interesting effect on the nVidia binary driver performance. While I could not really measure it, 'performance' seemed to have less shuttering.
    On the other hand, leaving a dual Xeon beast with performance had a noticeable impact on my power usage under medium loads (multiple active VMs), so I stayed with ondemand.

    - Gilboa
    DEV: Intel S2600C0, 2xE52658V2, 32GB, 4x2TB, GTX780, F20/x86_64, Dell U2711.
    SRV: Intel S5520SC, 2xX5680, 36GB, 4x2TB, GTX550, F20/x86_64, Dell U2412..
    BACK: Tyan Tempest i5400XT, 2xE5335, 8GB, 3x1.5TB, 9800GTX, F20/x86-64.
    LAP: ASUS N56VJ, i7-3630QM, 16GB, 1TB, 635M, F20/x86_64.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Couple years ago I found that VDPAU acceleration was broken (too slow) with cpufreq ondemand. It took me a long time to find the cause of the problem. The CPU usage always stayed low, but still cpufreq was the issue.

    Back then I just thought "my bad", but actually it turns out that cpufreq ondemand is/was just utterly broken for this scenario (CPU/GPU interaction). There is no other word for it.

    So, yes, it is plausible that nvidia binary OpenGL also benefits. However it may also be the cause that they do sth. in their module already while a game is running to prevent the problem, but just did not do the same thing for VDPAU.

  5. #5

    Default

    Up next in my Linux 3.12 kernel performance investigation will likely be binary driver tests and power consumption monitoring.
    Very very nice. What about testing the governor performace vs. ondemand? Regarding power consumption, heat and FPS...
    Thanks, Michael!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    22

    Default

    That's cute, now bring on reclocking.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bordeaux, France
    Posts
    321

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: Nouveau Performance Is Faster With Linux 3.12

    In following the AMD Radeon performance is incredible on Linux 3.12 article that benchmarked ten different AMD graphics cards on the Linux kernel, followed by the reason why AMD Radeon graphics are faster on Linux 3.12, here's now some benchmarks of the open-source NVIDIA driver with GeForce graphics cards. The testing in this article is a few NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards with the Nouveau driver when comparing the Linux 3.11 and 3.12 kernels in a similar fashion to the AMD Linux OpenGL performance testing. Like the AMD results, there are some notable gains to find with the yet-to-be-released 3.12 kernel.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19215

    Damn, a 9800 GTX has twice as much performance as a 680 on Xonotic.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Kansas.
    Posts
    294

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AnonymousCoward View Post
    Very very nice. What about testing the governor performace vs. ondemand? Regarding power consumption, heat and FPS...
    Thanks, Michael!
    He already tested the fps. The 3.12 kernel fixed the ondemand so that it now performs just as well as far as fps are concerned. (They made it more sticky, when pushed into a higher state, it will wait longer before going back to a lower frequency)

    He says he will be testing the ondemand power consumption in the next article. Don't know if it will be just a comparison with itself or if he will also compare it to performance.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •