If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wayland 1.3 Release Candidate 2 Arrives For Testing
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Fedora is the most important place since it is the gravity center for Wayland and Gnome development. Fear not, Fedora saves all
Yeah, but it's such a train wreck, aside being an incubation zone for a server OS - I installed the daily build yesterday which made me recall how shitty, weird and fancy is the installer - a bad design for smartphones applied to the PC, like putting lipstick on a pig.
Yeah pre release Fedora can be a bit shakey. You sound more like an ubuntu kinda guy. Stay at a service packed LTS version to be sure. Have fun in Canonical land when Mir is released.
whats this Mir thing you're talking about sounds like vaporware to me
Yeah pre release Fedora can be a bit shakey. You sound more like an ubuntu kinda guy. Stay at a service packed LTS version to be sure. Have fun in Canonical land when Mir is released.
For sure, anyone not loving Fedora must be an Ubuntu user. Another great example of Honton's logic.
Yeah pre release Fedora can be a bit shakey. You sound more like an ubuntu kinda guy. Stay at a service packed LTS version to be sure. Have fun in Canonical land when Mir is released.
I dislike Canonical and hate Mir, all for wayland, but apparently I'll use Ubuntu & Mir cause I find Unity a lot better thought out than Gnome 3 and desktop Fedora, despite Fedora probably being technically superior, which is why Fedora sucks to me as a desktop solution but is good for servers. So I'm not ideological, I go for what's easiest and sucks less out of the box. If Fedora makes a redesign of Gnome 3 to the better I'll switch over.
I suggest you start out thinking really hard about the difference between FSF-style CA and commercial CLA
Actually, I'd like you to explain this to me.
As a general rule I accept different levels of restrictions to different kind of software can be beneficial, but asymmetric licensing is always wrong.
1) You can accept software which can be closed by anyone at any time.
2) You can't accept Qt which is LGPL and can be closed by one party only, and if that happens, it automatically becomes 1)
No, I don't understand it because it doesn't make any sense. A neutral observer would get the idea that you are simply trolling, as evidenced by all your "KDE is dying" posts.
Comment