Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Mozilla Continues Advancing, Promoting Rust Language

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,625

    Default Mozilla Continues Advancing, Promoting Rust Language

    Phoronix: Mozilla Continues Advancing, Promoting Rust Language

    The Mozilla developers driving the Rust Programming Language have released version 0.8 of their language and compiler. Rust 0.8 has more than 2,200 changes with many bug-fixes and a few language-related changes...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTQ3MDc

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    11

    Default

    To me, Rust seems like a Scala for C

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    297

    Default

    As a programmer, I'm sick of having to deal with so many programming languages. I remember the times of CP/M and its Basic interpreter with nostalgia...

    A good slogan would be: Rust, the "new kid on the block".

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,485

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wargames View Post
    As a programmer, I'm sick of having to deal with so many programming languages. I remember the times of CP/M and its Basic interpreter with nostalgia...

    A good slogan would be: Rust, the "new kid on the block".
    I agree, there are way too many languages out there that are general purpose. I have no major issues with languages designed for a specific purpose (such as database languages or robot languages and so on) but there are dozens of languages out there that could just simply "go away". Off the top of my head, ruby, D, and delphi are a few that don't need to exist. Obviously if we were to "vote a language off the island", there's always going to be somebody upset about it. But IMO it's all about what languages accomplish their goals the best.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    541

    Default

    Just had a quick look into their docs, reads almost as someone tried to stuff as many keywords into it as possible. Reading somewhat more complex rust code must be serious fun... Not something I would expect from a modern, practical language.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    α Centauri
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Multiprocess by default having good scalability on many (2-8-16-32-...) cores.
    Will be nice to have a browser/OS compiled in Rust.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,193

    Default Linux kernel

    Imagine if the Linux kernel were ported to Rust...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schmidtbag View Post
    I agree, there are way too many languages out there that are general purpose. I have no major issues with languages designed for a specific purpose (such as database languages or robot languages and so on) but there are dozens of languages out there that could just simply "go away". Off the top of my head, ruby, D, and delphi are a few that don't need to exist. Obviously if we were to "vote a language off the island", there's always going to be somebody upset about it. But IMO it's all about what languages accomplish their goals the best.
    I'd say Python should go before Ruby, I really don't like languages that are dependant on white space.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by log0 View Post
    Just had a quick look into their docs, reads almost as someone tried to stuff as many keywords into it as possible. Reading somewhat more complex rust code must be serious fun... Not something I would expect from a modern, practical language.
    Our keywords: as, break, do, else, enum, extern, true, false, fn, for, if, impl, let, loop, match, mod, mut, once, priv, pub, ref, return, static, self, super, return, trait, type, unsafe, use, while, be, yield, typeof

    34, compared to python's 31, C's 33, or C++'s 87. I don't really see what the problem is?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andrei_me View Post
    To me, Rust seems like a Scala for C
    That's pretty much it. This looks exactly like the choice that C developers need.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •