Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 101

Thread: The SteamBox Countdown Is Complete

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    339

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asdfblah View Post
    Looks like no one has stated the obvious, which makes me think if I'm missing something...

    What worries me is the hardware support. Think about this: what hurts linux usage in the desktop is new users trying to use linux and failing to install/configure/run the distro, their programs and/or their (new) hardware. Let's say you download SteamOS and find out that it doesn't work as it should, what would you do? what do you think basic users/gamers will think, and say, about SteamOS and Linux? What do you think PC enthusiasts would think when their latest hardware doesn't even work?

    Now, if SteamOS is based on Ubuntu 12.04... what would the hardware support be? How many bugs (persistent) you have had coming from, say, video drivers, or audio, or...? Have you seen the state of fglrx and the F/OS radeon driver? For me, fglrx has been a mess (it's good until you find one of those annoying bugs), and the F/OS driver is still being developed, it lacks optimizations, testing, features, ... and this is for the old architecture. Have you looked at GCN+ GPUs support? it's just recently started, kernel 3.12 still doesn't have complete support, AFAIK, and there is NO distro shipping 3.12 as official kernel.

    I don't think a customized, downloadable distro is a good idea for Steam, or for anyone else wanting to have a product with good support.

    I really hope I'm wrong about this all, though.
    New users will not need to install SteamOS, they just need to buy a SteamBox which will have SteamOS preinstalled and configured with the proper drivers. And, any manufacturer can take SteamOS and build its own SteamBox and it's the manufacturer's responsibility to make sure the drivers are configured correctly, not the user's responsibility. This is exactly what happens on the Windows side. In short, you are wrong.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    68

    Default GPL and Kernel Blobs

    The Steam Box is exciting, but what is the current legal situation around shipping BLOBs linked to the Kernel?

    I thought that the reason that the ATI/NVidia drivers were "ok" was that effectively the end user downloads and installs them (i.e. the bits that link to GPL code/headers aren't supplied in binary form)?

    Can Valve actually ship a Linux kernel including pre-built kernel modules for ATI/NVidia? I know that the standard Distros don't (at least by default - you have to enable an iffy non-free repo)...

  3. #53
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OneTimeShot View Post
    One thing that I may have missed with all the excitement about the Steam Box is "how does the NVidia/ATI BLOB work with the GPL"?

    My understanding was that the *end user* has to download the BLOB, compile the wrapper that references the GPL headers, and install it. If someone were to compile the module (and thus include links to the GPL symbols) and try to ship that, it would be considered a derivative work of the GPL bits.

    Can Valve ship an OS that includes the kernel module-link BLOBs? Or are they going to make the user download and install them? I know that Debian/Ubuntu/Fedora don't ship with the BLOBs for this reason...

    Can I just say "Hmm... Could I have the source code for everything that you ship linked to GPL licensed code?"
    Valve can distribute the blobs just fine with their distro if they wish however to avoid a bunch of stink being made they can just do like many other distros do for binary packages and point the system to a link away from the distribution media. openSUSE for example points nvidia and amd users to nvidia's and amd's own hosted repositories.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asdfblah View Post
    What do you think PC enthusiasts would think when their latest hardware doesn't even work?
    I pretty much agree with your post, but this, I need to point out, is a contradiction. A PC enthusiast that doesn't bother reading before testing anything (this means, you should actually check support for your hardware, and have a basic understanding of its situation) is either not really an enthusiast, or severely stupid.

    Quote Originally Posted by e8hffff View Post
    And we are going to hear all the whinners since it will use Mir and Nvidia and AMD will do their drivers for it.
    Are you sure? The only (not confirmed) claim I've seen is that it will be based on Ubuntu 12.04. Which uses X.org.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iniudan View Post
    Which is why I think the game streaming client, will be release under free license, so OEM can compile it for their different consumer device embedded OS, for I easily see smart TV and Apple TV like box manufacturer, except maybe for Sony, integrating that service.

    The server on the other hand will be proprietary, due to been integrated in the steam client.
    That is a great point. Valve would have much to gain from that approach. Would Valve be concerned that this may lead to incompatible fragmentation through modifications introduced by equipment vendors? Google's solution to this problem in Android has been a proprietary runtime that only Google-approved vendors are allowed access to, which in my opinion is an absolutely horrible solution. I hope that this mode of thinking does not influence Valve.

    Even though I don't play games personally, I would love to see an open source Steam client that distributions can distribute through their repositories, using their own packaging and distribution techniques. I believe something like that would strengthen the existing concepts of centralized package management, which I have always felt was one of the key practical advantages of the Linux world over proprietary OSes.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    797

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kristian Joensen View Post
    I saw the Linuxcon video that was posted and it didn't include anything about Infinity Ward or Call of Duty IIRC.
    It does. "We made it easier for the Call of Duty guys"

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    176

    Default

    They say play also all your Win/Mac games! I wonder how...streaming from where to the TV? It needs two machines running?
    Will all games be in 3D with a 3D TV or there's more needed?
    Thanks
    Last edited by mike4; 09-24-2013 at 01:06 AM.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    California
    Posts
    124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackout23 View Post
    It does. "We made it easier for the Call of Duty guys"
    correct, he does say that, which is what I was referring to although I didn't notice it the first time. That statement in addition to this tweet from infinityward back in march: http://www.geek.com/games/infinity-w...m-box-1541671/

  9. #59
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mike4 View Post
    They say play also all your Win/Mac games! I wonder how...streaming from where to the TV? It needs two machines running?
    Yes. The Windows PC would stream to a SteamBox attached to the TV. Kind of similar to the NVIDIA Shield concept. That's for games that don't have native Linux versions.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    48

    Default

    I think SteamOS is a good idea because this way gaming on most Linux distros will be easily supported via automatically set up SteamOS chroots (delivered as a package through existing package management), suddenly making many Linux distros viable choices for gamers and giving developers a single build target for near universal Linux support... hopefully.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •