Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Intel Iris Pro Linux Graphics Yield Some Wins Against Windows

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,392

    Default Intel Iris Pro Linux Graphics Yield Some Wins Against Windows

    Phoronix: Intel Iris Pro Linux Graphics Yield Some Wins Against Windows

    For the past few days at Phoronix we have begun looking extensively at the Intel Iris Pro 5200 graphics under Linux, since receiving the System76 Galago UltraPro. The Iris Pro 5200 are the new high-end Intel Haswell graphics that have 128MB of embedded video RAM on the die, which should yield a nice performance boost when properly implemented within the Intel Linux driver. Already our testing has found the Iris Pro performance on Linux has doubled with open-source driver improvements since Haswell's launch. Now we're out today with our first Intel Iris Pro OpenGL gaming benchmarks between Ubuntu Linux and Microsoft Windows 8 for this Intel Core i7 Ultrabook.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19116

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    168

    Default

    Even when it was behind, Linux was pretty close in most of these with the new drivers. And considering where we were just recently, this is a dramatic improvement! I only hope it keeps approaching a graceful and powerful level of performance as development continues.

    Is there another article already that compares Iris Pro to Ivy Bridge?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2

    Default

    I just come here to put out one suggestion. Given that Steam is on Linux for a while, can we start using some games on Steam as benchmarks? Just as many Windows reviews do? That could both provide more useful information for the Linux gaming crowd, and foster grounds of improvement for real games that many people play. (I am not saying current benchmarks are useless, but there is definitely a disconnection between Windows reviews and Linux ones. Using common and popular games could significantly reduce this gap.)

    Then whenever someone doubts the usability of Linux as a gaming platform, we can simply point it to these benchmark: this is the performance you know in Windows, and Linux is better/same/slightly slower, etc.
    Last edited by wujj123456; 09-19-2013 at 02:48 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Show us in benchmark min/max FPS because avg. nothing say about preformance. If Ubuntu wins in OpenArena with Windows, and you say it is very good than I have no more comments about you test procedure ...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wujj123456 View Post
    I just come here to put out one suggestion. Given that Steam is on Linux for a while, can we start using some games on Steam as benchmarks? Just as many Windows reviews do? That could both provide more useful information for the Linux gaming crowd, and foster grounds of improvement for real games that many people play. (I am not saying current benchmarks are useless, but there is definitely a disconnection between Windows reviews and Linux ones. Using common and popular games could significantly reduce this gap.)

    Then whenever someone doubts the usability of Linux as a gaming platform, we can simply point it to these benchmark: this is the performance you know in Windows, and Linux is better/same/slightly slower, etc.
    +1 I was going to ask the same. Michael has said in the past that he has had some issues benchmarking steam games, but we really need it, at least as a baseline. Does the source engine (half-life2 / portal / dota / cs / left4dead) compare to openarena/xonotic and has better performance, or is it like unigine and has half the performance?
    How about Serious Sam 3? Natural Selection 2? Brutal Legend? Killing Floor? Dungeon Defenders?

    Especially since sometimes developers don't test them and Michael ends up uncovering issues in his testing and raising some eyebrows. We really need testing on those titles.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    458

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [Knuckles] View Post
    +1 I was going to ask the same. Michael has said in the past that he has had some issues benchmarking steam games, but we really need it, at least as a baseline. Does the source engine (half-life2 / portal / dota / cs / left4dead) compare to openarena/xonotic and has better performance, or is it like unigine and has half the performance?
    How about Serious Sam 3? Natural Selection 2? Brutal Legend? Killing Floor? Dungeon Defenders?

    Especially since sometimes developers don't test them and Michael ends up uncovering issues in his testing and raising some eyebrows. We really need testing on those titles.
    Not all of these propose reproducable benchmarking.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wujj123456 View Post
    I just come here to put out one suggestion. Given that Steam is on Linux for a while, can we start using some games on Steam as benchmarks? Just as many Windows reviews do? That could both provide more useful information for the Linux gaming crowd, and foster grounds of improvement for real games that many people play. (I am not saying current benchmarks are useless, but there is definitely a disconnection between Windows reviews and Linux ones. Using common and popular games could significantly reduce this gap.)

    Then whenever someone doubts the usability of Linux as a gaming platform, we can simply point it to these benchmark: this is the performance you know in Windows, and Linux is better/same/slightly slower, etc.
    Read: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...tem&px=MTQxMzY

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,598

    Default

    @Calinou

    That's incorrect. Every game with Unreal engine (Killing Floor uses a 2.5 variant) has a benchmark mode. Try:

    http://kanotix.com/files/fix/tmp/kf/...lling-floor.sh

    Or with your own demos:

    http://kanotix.com/files/fix/tmp/kf/...ing-floor.bash

    I dont have got DD installed and it crashed very often when i tried it, but if you could record demos it should work similar. Btw. it would work with an offline KF install as well (if you used it as trial before it still can be used for solo mode/offline).

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    @Calinou

    That's incorrect. Every game with Unreal engine (Killing Floor uses a 2.5 variant) has a benchmark mode. Try:

    http://kanotix.com/files/fix/tmp/kf/...lling-floor.sh

    Or with your own demos:

    http://kanotix.com/files/fix/tmp/kf/...ing-floor.bash

    I dont have got DD installed and it crashed very often when i tried it, but if you could record demos it should work similar. Btw. it would work with an offline KF install as well (if you used it as trial before it still can be used for solo mode/offline).
    That still relies upon Steam where the game could be updated without knowing and not for sure at the same version as others.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    So I see the issues you are putting forward. That's doesn't relieve the curiosity of your readers (including myself) to know how these games perform! I mean they don't have to be part of your regular regimine of game benchmarks, but I would like to see these games (including some other games that have been recently released on linux) be included in the more extensive reviews. You could include a disclaimer with benchmarks for those games.

    k thnx bai.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •