Originally posted by Vim_User
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Systemd-Logind Device Management For Wayland
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by intellivision View PostSo this is a way to cripple the BSDs by proxy, by having essential future frameworks e.g. Wayland depend on SystemD which is Linux only?
Sounds pretty bleak.Last edited by Guest; 25 August 2013, 06:03 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by intellivision View PostSo this is a way to cripple the BSDs by proxy, by having essential future frameworks e.g. Wayland depend on SystemD which is Linux only?
Sounds pretty bleak.
Optional support is different than mandatory hard dependency.
Comment
-
Originally posted by intellivision View PostI wonder if there's a reason of putting all this extra stuff into SystemD.
I mean, if they're also looking for BSD compatibility then this is the wrong way to go about it.
As to what it has to do with systemd - well, isn't that what systemd is for? It's not just a classic dumb init daemon, afterall - it's a system process manager, responsible for anything that needs to be started or shut down, be that an SSH or web server, or a user login service. It already has the idea of tracking sessions by way of grouping processes in such a way that they can be shut down cleanly - it's not that much of a stretch for it to take responsibility of tracking which devices are associated with a session.
Originally posted by intellivision View PostSo this is a way to cripple the BSDs by proxy, by having essential future frameworks e.g. Wayland depend on SystemD which is Linux only?
Sounds pretty bleak.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dvdhrm View PostIt will always support VTs as fallback.
Originally posted by Pawlerson View PostSounds pretty smart and sane. BSD doesn't contribute anything useful for Linux and I see no reason why Linux community should give them a thing. It's BSD problem it's years behind Linux, but nobody cares about their problems here. They can always try to write their own framework, but this would stop entire BSD development due to lack of manpower.
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View Post...and I've heard it described as they want it to be "the userspace kernel"....
Originally posted by dvdhrmIt will always support VTs as fallback.
Originally posted by Delgarde[/quoteWhich is currently part of the systemd source tree, but can be used in isolation - hence recent discussions about it being used in Ubuntu.
Originally posted by intellivisionCitation needed, post your proof for your claim now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vim_User View PostSo you have a link to a developers comment about that?
Wayland was initially designed for linux only, because that's what the developer who ran it was using. Eventually some BSD devs came along and ported it to run on BSD. The same thing will either happen with Systemd, or it won't. That's up to the BSD devs to decide. And as mentioned, Wayland obviously won't have a hard dependency on it - they are just making it all optional right now.Last edited by smitty3268; 25 August 2013, 07:03 PM.
Comment
Comment