Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: 16-Way Graphics Card Comparison On Open-Source Linux

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,395

    Default 16-Way Graphics Card Comparison On Open-Source Linux

    Phoronix: 16-Way Graphics Card Comparison On Open-Source Linux

    To get October off to a good start, in this article are benchmark results of sixteen Intel HD, AMD Radeon, and NVIDIA GeForce graphics processors all being tested from the latest open-source Linux graphics driver stack. The test setup is powered by the Linux 3.12 development kernel and the Mesa 9.3.0-devel OpenGL drivers.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19157

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    57

    Default thumbs up

    nice and hard work.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    202

    Default

    Yes, nice work.

    I'm a little confused about the Unigine results though; your charts show that the frame rates are higher when using a higher output resolution. How can doing more work be faster?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,904

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyborg16 View Post
    Yes, nice work.

    I'm a little confused about the Unigine results though; your charts show that the frame rates are higher when using a higher output resolution. How can doing more work be faster?
    I've noticed that in tests for a while now. It could be something about hitting the monitors native resolution avoiding some slow operation, but it is definitely weird. I thought it was a typo the first few times i caught it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    95

    Default

    It will be nice to see AMD vs INTEL APUs comprision test. AMD products with both closed + open source drivers with 2133MHz RAM and Intel with fastest available RAM for those platforms too. Power saving test included for those platforms will be also nice.

    Anyway thanks Michael for nice test on Linux

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,272

    Default

    I'm not sure what's up with Michael's 6570. It performs much lower than expected on the first 3 pages of tests, and then performs where you would expect it to perform realtive to the other asics on the last 4 pages of tests.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Thanks for this brilliant comparison! I already saw the separate Radeon and Nouveau results and that led me to get a Radeon HD 6000 series. I'm very happy with it. Using an open source* driver is important to me, but nouveau support for my former Nvidia card was still after many months' active development just too slow and unstable for serious use.

    * radeon driver still requires non-free microcode blob; but there again much source code of the supposedly 'open' nouveau driver is just magic numbers being shoved into registers, and comments like "not sure what this part does".

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nadro View Post
    It will be nice to see AMD vs INTEL APUs comprision test. AMD products with both closed + open source drivers with 2133MHz RAM and Intel with fastest available RAM for those platforms too. Power saving test included for those platforms will be also nice.

    Anyway thanks Michael for nice test on Linux
    there is no such thing as intel apu.
    it's the same architecture as a pentium D but with better cpu and gpu.
    how the hell intel has an apu?
    if that is happening the all cpu+gpu dies are apus.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    440

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yorgos View Post
    there is no such thing as intel apu.
    ...
    if that is happening the all cpu+gpu dies are apus.
    I think APU is just being used as shorthand for "CPU and integrated GPU".

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    23

    Default any way to test non-gameing performance?

    I have been running a slightly older AMD card with multiple rotated monitors and i've found that simple text scrolling in an xterm is noticably slow. I know that the 3D gameing performance is what's sexy, but many people spend far more time not using games :-)

    Thisis a HD6770 card with a pair of HD monitors that I've had for a few years. The card is old enough that the closed source drivers call it unsupported, so I'm looking for a replacement, but don't want to waste money on something that's not an improvement

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •