Page 3 of 18 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 175

Thread: Canonical Continues Working On XMir Performance

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    772

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrYak View Post
    translation: The whole Mir/XMir stack on upcoming Ubuntu is going to be just a glorified page flipper. That's it. No actual Mir functionnality. XMir is basically a full fledged X server, and relies on Mir only to flip the buffers. Yeah, good work canonical !
    That's my take, too. In theory, this is being done to get people testing Mir - but if they're using XMir, there's very little Mir functionality actually being tested. No window management functions - all it's doing is creating a full-screen surface, then handing over all control to the X server. Maybe it shakes out the driver layer a bit, but it's hard to see it being worth the risk, or the effort compared to porting stuff to run natively.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oleid View Post
    I see... in that case, you must work with a different type non-technical users than I do
    User: Why doesn't this website work?
    Me: comes over and takes a look.
    Me: Oh, you can't use the right mouse button. You have to click with the left mouse button.
    User: Oh, ok. I guess i can do that.
    Me: /gets drunk

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Delgarde View Post
    That's my take, too. In theory, this is being done to get people testing Mir - but if they're using XMir, there's very little Mir functionality actually being tested. No window management functions - all it's doing is creating a full-screen surface, then handing over all control to the X server. Maybe it shakes out the driver layer a bit, but it's hard to see it being worth the risk, or the effort compared to porting stuff to run natively.
    I think it's about 2 things.

    1. Mark said Mir would be done, so therefore it must be done and out there, even if it's completely useless to do so at the moment. AKA making sure the boss doesn't feel stupid.

    2. Pressuring AMD and NVidia to release drivers by being able to point to all the Ubuntu users out there who would be using it but aren't.

    So really both cases just come down to PR and marketing.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts
    115

    Default

    And to think that word "Mir" actually means "Peace"
    Excellent choice

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    177

    Default

    This all doesn't make sense to me...how about we all update x and stick to that? Linux is enough fragmented like for ex. the silly rpm and deb packages.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mike4 View Post
    This all doesn't make sense to me...how about we all update x and stick to that? Linux is enough fragmented like for ex. the silly rpm and deb packages.
    Because X has problems caused by fundamental design flaws that can't be solved in any practical way, and we already have Wayland which solves all those problems AND provides backwards compatibility with X via XWayland.

    But you're right, Mir doesn't make sense. Canonical should be backing Wayland like they promised, instead of trying to fuck the entire desktop Linux ecosystem up the arse.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,601

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mike4 View Post
    This all doesn't make sense to me...how about we all update x and stick to that?
    That was the plan, yes. The updated X is called Wayland. Most distributions are still going to follow the plan.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,116

    Default tleo charity

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    Wrong. The updated X is called Mir. Wayland is a couple of amateurs in the basement. Mir is done by a real company that has already proven itself by creating Ubuntu, the leading edge and most popular Linux distro. If it wasn't for Ubuntu, Linux would still only be used by Linus and his 3 friends.
    You get it backwards again. Wayland is created by professionals with years of experience in that specific field, while Canonical hired some amateurs that weren't even able to analyze Wayland correctly. Hiring amateurs does not suddenly make them experts.
    Oh, by the way, Wayland is only supported by such companies like Intel and Red Hat, companies that make Canonical look like a charity.
    By the way, do you have any proof that Linux would not have more users without Ubuntu or are you just pulling this out of your ass?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    750

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    You get it backwards again. Wayland is created by professionals with years of experience in that specific field, while Canonical hired some amateurs that weren't even able to analyze Wayland correctly. Hiring amateurs does not suddenly make them experts.
    Oh, by the way, Wayland is only supported by such companies like Intel and Red Hat, companies that make Canonical look like a charity.
    By the way, do you have any proof that Linux would not have more users without Ubuntu or are you just pulling this out of your ass?
    Please please please just put him in your ignore list and stop answering to him.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by erendorn View Post
    Please please please just put him in your ignore list and stop answering to him.
    If we do not correct his wrong statements some people may believe that he is actually right.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •