Page 7 of 12 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 115

Thread: The First Benchmarks Of Unity On XMir: There's A Performance Hit

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheOne View Post
    I have a big query.

    If Canonical just copy/pasted the XWayland code to make XMir then every person saying that XWayland will be faster that plain X is utterly wrong. We haven't seen any benchmarks regarding XWayland/Wayland, so if XMir is really a copy/paste effort Wayland should be similarly on the same shape.
    They use the same code base, but as I understand they to adapt it in Mir and at the end you have :
    Mir > xMir > Xorg
    Versus
    Wayland > xWayland > Xorg
    So it depend of how they adapt it and how the base Wayland and Mir works... But I'm not sure.
    Michael will do some Wayland Vs Mir benchmark soon, for sure

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,910

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    Why is it so hard to admit that Canonical basically wiped the floor with your beloved Wayland? Started later, finished sooner.
    Hahaha. Now they're finished. :rofl:

    Nothing even runs on this thing yet, but it's finished

    Time to move to the next marketing buzzword.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seb24 View Post
    Stop fighting... The both project are free software with different objective. We should be happy to have a dynamic eco-system. that's it.
    And we will see in the future how the 2 project will evolves.
    Yeah... At this point the whole Mir/Wayland debate is so exhausted that I have to agree with the people who are eating popcorn... Better wait and see, and not bother wasting breath in such discussions.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,021

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheOne View Post
    I have a big query.

    If Canonical just copy/pasted the XWayland code to make XMir then every person saying that XWayland will be faster that plain X is utterly wrong. We haven't seen any benchmarks regarding XWayland/Wayland, so if XMir is really a copy/paste effort Wayland should be similarly on the same shape.
    Xwayland/Xmir is not a magical separated magic but is just a translator from X11 api to Wayland/Mir API, so if in Mir the operation took 100 cycles and in wayland took 5 cycles you will notice it in the xorg apps right away for example, it just a translation layer so the speed on the actual backend regardless of how the layer convert between the two

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    183

    Default

    We're on page 7 right now. How many pages would we have, if we left out any BO$$ post and related reply, while increasing overall quality?

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    Fedora 20? That OS for the masses that will bring desktop dominance for Linux? Wait. Shit. No. Fedora is basically and experimental branch where they test new things in the wild for the first time, probably to improve next version of RHEL. Anyway still too late for them. Ubuntu will have it for the next version in October. And Ubuntu is for the masses. So people will be exposed to Mir first. Why is it so hard to admit that Canonical basically wiped the floor with your beloved Wayland? Started later, finished sooner. That is what a successful project looks like.
    BO$$ you really need to stop sucking off Canonical

    Redhat Intel Raspberry pi Kubuntu Debian Carsten Munk Tizen Sailfish OS and any non Ubuntu Unity is backing Wayland most of the code in Mir is just a fork of Wayland Android Carsten Munk work Libhybris making it even more buggy shitty you dont know how long it's going to take to remove all the bug's form Mir it may take years do to it trying to move away form the code it's based off from and it's the most Epic Fail of the Linux World Wayland the way Canonical is going is why i jumped ship it's going to be really bad for any one Developing on Linux Canonical just Fucked all Linux Develpers Linux Gamers Linux Users do you know how hard it is going to be to get Windows Developers to look at Linux now?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=-V8i8zZPzbU

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrjbeE90vVY

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    145

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jrch2k8 View Post
    Xwayland/Xmir is not a magical separated magic but is just a translator from X11 api to Wayland/Mir API, so if in Mir the operation took 100 cycles and in wayland took 5 cycles you will notice it in the xorg apps right away for example, it just a translation layer so the speed on the actual backend regardless of how the layer convert between the two
    I thought XWayland and XMir were different implementations of the X api that used their respective backends. But it seems that was too much work to put on so instead they just created another layer .

    It would have been of much performance if the x.so library was replaced with a a different implemtation xwayland/mir.so

    Edit: mmm much like MicroXwin does
    Last edited by TheOne; 06-28-2013 at 12:42 PM.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,756

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chrisb View Post
    Applications running under XWayland will also have a performance hit. It is impossible to have a compatibility layer without a performance hit.
    Not necessarily. if you actually look at the architecture of XWayland and XMir you actually avoid a few expensive steps at the end vs real X. In theory, its possible for us to have slightly better performance via XMir and XWayland than Real X. But obviously an alpha-quality release won't have the optimizations and design to actually make that claim true just yet.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,297

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alexThunder View Post
    We're on page 7 right now. How many pages would we have, if we left out any BO$$ post and related reply, while increasing overall quality?
    I must admit that BO$$ has the most impressive tackle box of lures here. Not that there is any sort of difficulty getting a bite around these parts, but he's got a certain finesse and effectiveness that has not gone unnoticed.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    some planet
    Posts
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    So in order to make sure they get it right we will probably have Wayland ready somewhere around 2050. Or 2100 to get it REAALLY right.
    Then make your f-ing Project Leaders and their ass-licker developers to contribute the Wayland Project in order to make it work properly. (as they desire - since it's actually working.)

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    One word: Freedom. They can do it. They can fork the entire linux kernel and create their own OS and create the greatest marketing campaign on Earth and sell it and become more successful than all the distros combined.
    And if they fork the hell out of our kernel, Linux Ecosystem and Linux Community achieves nothing. Canonical forks everything from Linux and becomes what Apple became after BSD. - Like a BO$$.

    Everyone has their freedom of doing whatever the f! they want to. But what would our community gets from this? Not all of us are blind Canonical fanboys and in need of a new "Steve Jobs"-a-like. We need an overall progression and Distribution Managements are getting more retarded everyday and not trying to let their community to test some certain part of this ecosystem. They just "move" - How the f! is this logical?

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    It's been 95% done for a couple of years now. That Weston genius from what I heard had trouble with the minimize button. As in they didn't have it. Brilliant reference implementation. Everything in Wayland is a sad joke and free software hipsters won't see it because they think Canonical == Evil while Wayland == Good. Mir is already the future. And it's already here. Wake up people!
    Mir is not the future. It's yet to prove itself. When it's ready for a showdown, we're going to test it and like or dislike the way it's walking. But this objectivity (which fanboys like you cannot understand) is for better future for our ecosystem. We're not some company's fanatics or just a bunch of hippies; we're people with different choices, different ideals. The one thing binds us here is Linux Ecosystem and this ecosystem is more than just our hobbies but our jobs.

    Before we decide something, we analyze the every possible aspect of such work. Then we decide if that's for us or not. But raising our voice cannot hurt any f-ing homo sapiens sapiens on this pathetic planet but only some fanatically blind people like you.

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    One word: freedom. Because they can. They can fork the whole kernel and create their own modified version and then create the coolest marketing campaign on Earth and wipe the floor with all the other distros.
    Freedom. Because they can consume the hell out of their market. Freedom to consume and to be consumed. Freedom to stay blind but saying otherwise. Freedom to decline every logical path and just lick the path some Rich Hillbilly Boy decided.

    But, yes, they have this freedom. It's just, we're sick of Apple wannabees and Apple Fanatics.
    Last edited by reznov; 06-28-2013 at 01:16 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •