Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 113

Thread: Reasons For Losing Motivation In Wayland

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    109

    Default

    Somewhere something not fixed/merged/updated? It will be hard for one (open source) project to develop while relying on many other projects. Canonical has the advantage of developing Mir targeted at smaller range of applications and code - for Unity. And they can always do-it-yourself and hack/patch or drop code of external projects. They don't need upstream actions as much as Wayland.

    Maybe some organization/company has to make deadlines and some bounties for making stuff done?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    France
    Posts
    309

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ancurio View Post
    This is very interesting. I once heard somewhere that missing manpower was explicitly not a problem concerning the Noveau project,
    but this post of yours seems to say the opposite.

    Are there any guides/are you guys writing notes of your work that would enable other volunteers to pick up
    some of the work of REing, to speed the whole process up?
    You must confuse money with man power as we indeed said that money wasn't the problem (except for buying Quadro cards). Man power is the single problem of all open source projects and ours is badly hit by this. How can we compete with nvidia if we only have less than 10 people working part time on the driver, without documentation Luckily, we gallium3D helps factoring out code between 3D/CL open source drivers devs.

    As for a list of projects to do, I try to propose projects for the GSoC/EVoC. Otherwise, all the documentation and most tools that we use are centralized in the envytools repo: https://github.com/pathscale/envytools/

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,057

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DanL View Post
    It certainly is fatal for a lot of laptop users, especially those who want to run a 3D desktop.
    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    Why not inform before posting bullshit?
    Even on low power-settings my laptop (and those of many others with AMD chipsets) runs 15C hotter than on Catalyst, making this driver unusable on the hardware. So what does it matter that there is manual settings if it is still crap? And yes, there is a bug report for it, marked as critical, but nothing happens. I suspect just because AMD is working on power-saving code that maybe will released, maybe not, dependent on what the legal department says.
    Catalyst is a must on that machine and if you look at AMD's enormous development speed maybe we will see Wayland support in 3-5 years in Catalyst.
    I had a Xi 1554 with Mobility X1900 and it drove 3D desktop just fine in low profile.
    At high profile, it was 60C hot and ACPI fan did the job. Can you give that bug please?
    So for my laptop, PM is not critical. Its BIG problem, but not critical; but no way any Catalyst for me, ever!

    Quote Originally Posted by johnc View Post
    But the end result is the same.
    The end result does not really matter so long it constitutes a problem. In this case the piping matters.
    Last edited by brosis; 06-12-2013 at 05:13 PM.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    315

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jrch2k8 View Post
    beside remember wayland xwayland mesa Xorg drivers Xorg+dri3000 are being developed in parallallel, so is not like they are sitting in their asses watching the roof and Canonical's Mir just leech this changes since they don't contribute anything at all giving the sensation that Mir is getting done faster which is false. make OSS stack license incompatible with Mir from X to Kernel modules and lets see how fast can Mir rewrite all that code themselves
    Well the whole point whit open source is that you should take what's good.
    Also Wayland developers are also leeching on Mesa, Cairo, the Linux kernel or whatever.

    Why should people who write a display server write drivers? And why should people who write drivers have to write a display server?
    If every single project had to develop a whole new os including kernel, drivers, display server themselves we would be stuck in in the stone-age.

    I also find the critic very funny on another plane 'cause if Canonical started to create their own drivers people would scream Not In Home instead.

    Guess you are never going to be happy? My recommendation, chill out and have a beer instead.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7

    Default

    @ML who spewed forth this gibberish in the "article":
    Cairo's current build testing is a mess.
    Cairo has nothing, I repeat nothing whatsoever to do with Wayland. Stop trolling the community, ML.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,057

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MPF View Post
    Well, as a Nouveau developer working on power management, I must say that power management on Nouveau is far from full! We managed to get some initial power management for some cards, but it isn't stable for others. We are still working on reverse engineering all that!
    Hi MuPuF! I have suggested prior that you guys use kickstarter-ish scheme for this: realistic goals - money - donations - mercenary work.
    My vision is that there is no need to posses 100 developers, there is need for good organization where personal interests (I am *not* talking about altruism here) will drive the development. And 100 developers will come.

    For example, you could start to use phoronix mass media, to post monthly refresher on:
    - accomplished goals (essentially changelog)
    - ongoing efforts, requiring attention (for contributors)
    - required efforts, requiring known specific donation (for supporters and mercenary developers)
    - hardware requirements, for those interested in hardware donation
    - testing USB images, for people interested in ability to run your tests on their nvidia hardware, effortlessly and without interaction; and then submit data to you.

    I understand that you run it as a student project, but if you don't take it seriously, nothing serious can emerge. You know it anyways, so don't take this as a rant

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    797

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pajn View Post
    Well, there is XWayland too.

    But I agree Cairo and Mesa should also be fully unit tested.
    Unit testing is *not* a magic bullet. It's certainly a very useful tool for developers, but having automated tests isn't going magically transform your development process such that bugs and breaks never occur. There's plenty of crap code out there with 100% test coverage...

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    123

    Default

    This article has specifically gone out of its way to piss me off it seems. The problems stated are not even Wayland issues but have deducted Wayland's reputation. Regardless of the viability of current Wayland, this article is complete and utter FUD with a misleading title. Regardless of that, if you read the mailing list, support was still provided in response to the post for both cairo and mesa bugs, which is laughingly all it takes to get someone to notice a problem. There is no need for some bullshit drama that has now been caused over a single post of a frustrated individual.

    Be realistic please... it's fine to not use Wayland now... there's not enough application support for every day use yet. Even finding a capable web browser, especially one that we're familiar with, is a very daunting task. That does not reduce the potential or usability of Wayland itself, only the usability of those applications that have yet to bring such support.

    Stop inadvertently blaming wayland for things it cannot and will never control.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    184

    Default About driver...

    Buy an Intel card. Their work as Open Source Development Centre deserve it.
    That is the right approach. Their driver are closing the gap about the OpenGL pretty fastly. Soon they will achieve the parity with the last specification and from that time they will stay on pair easily. The power of their GPU increase year by year so as the optimization and power consumption. So buy Intel.
    About nvidia, there is always a middle finger available for them and for their ancient, cronic and stupid way of thinking.
    Wayland is the future, with or without nvidia.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,599

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by valeriodean View Post
    Buy an Intel card. Their work as Open Source Development Centre deserve it.
    That is the right approach. Their driver are closing the gap about the OpenGL pretty fastly. Soon they will achieve the parity with the last specification and from that time they will stay on pair easily. The power of their GPU increase year by year so as the optimization and power consumption. So buy Intel.
    About nvidia, there is always a middle finger available for them and for their ancient, cronic and stupid way of thinking.
    Wayland is the future, with or without nvidia.
    lol

    this forum is the best

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •