Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 76

Thread: Intel Core i7 4770K "Haswell" Benchmarks On Ubuntu Linux

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,521

    Default

    Intel HD 4600 graphics
    No, it's Intel HD Graphics 4600. Check Intel ARK if you want to be sure. Hence why it's appropriate to call it HDG 4600 and it won't be confused with AMD Radeon HD 4600 line of graphics cards.

    The Xonotic temperature measurements are definitely not right. The A10 average temperature is 5 degrees? That's physically impossible...

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Sounds like the issue might just be a feature that defaults to off in radeon but on in the intel driver. Not sure what current state is, but floating point textures and texture compression/s3tc used to be the main areas.
    Thanks, Bridgman, I'll take a look again. There is some debug info available on the command line, it's just a matter of having the time to chase it ... cheers!

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1

    Default At least one propagated feature is missing: SMAP

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: Intel Core i7 4770K "Haswell" Benchmarks On Ubuntu Linux

    This past weekend I shared the first experiences of running Intel's new Haswell CPU on Linux. While Intel Haswell is a beast and brings many new features and innovations to the new Core CPUs ...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=18754
    What I'm missing in the /proc/cpuinfo output of the i7 4770K and the engineering sample I've at hand is SMAP. Though it's uninteresting for graphics stuff and benchmarking, but it has been propagated in every article I can find about Haswell.

    So, I'm wondering: where is it? Does anyone has serious informations why it's not there?

    SMAP - Supervisor mode access prevention: http://lwn.net/Articles/517475/

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lordmetroid View Post
    If you are going to test the IGPs I hope you will test

    The common Intel HD 4600
    The mobile/BGA Intel Iris Pro 5200
    AMD HD 7660D with Catalyst drivers
    AMD HD 7660D with Open Source drivers
    There is also

    AMD HD 8660D with Catalyst drivers (just released, Richland)
    AMD HD 8660D with Open Source drivers

    At least in Windows, for what I've seen, Richland is 25% or so faster than Trinity. It also has a higher overclocking ceiling (http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/15...or-steamroller)
    Last edited by mendieta; 06-05-2013 at 09:41 AM. Reason: Typo: 7660->8660

  5. #55

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mendieta View Post
    There is also

    AMD HD 8660D with Catalyst drivers (just released, Richland)
    AMD HD 8660D with Open Source drivers
    Except that I haven't gotten any hardware out of AMD in a long time now...

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kivada View Post
    Ok, then let's do a price comparison here, what the best bang for your computing buck? I'm using the same very popular shop for all parts.

    $179.98 basic A10-5800K system

    $264.98 basic FX-8350 system

    $414.98 basic i7-4770K system

    I'm assuming that ram, psu, drives and case are identical across all systems and thus left out of the comparison.
    Sure, I actually said the same thing in my first post in this thread. AMD has better performance/price ratio for sure, for CPU. And as you noted, when you compound this with least expensive mobo's, the difference is really substantial, in terms of value. On the integrated graphics, AMD was much better, and now that Intel is catching up, the perforance is similar but AMD again provides better value.

    Your comparison is lacking a bit, though, in hat the FX-8350 needs a ~$70 discreet card to compete with the i7-4770K. This brings it to $335, which is 20% cheaper than the Intel solution. Not a huge difference, but sure, a better value.

    The A10-5800K is a better value as compared to Intel if you put apples to apples. But it's at a different ballpark altogether.

    Thanks for the figures!

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,991

    Default

    At least Richland has the same gpu as Trinity (Cayman), not GCN as was misreported by some sites - it uses the mature r600g driver, not the experimental radeonsi.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    How do you propose getting a repeatable, offline test profile for a MMO?
    it doesnt need to be repeatable. it needs to be actual gameplay. That is all that matters when benching games. You play games so gameplay on the newest release is what matters. MMOs should be benchmarked as such as often as releases are made.

    It's not hard to understand that games are meant to be played so gameplay is what should be benchmarked. Obviously gameplay is not exactly repeatable.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    Except that I haven't gotten any hardware out of AMD in a long time now...
    It's pretty easy to see why after reading quite a few of your articles, though the last few has left out negative innuendo so they have improved.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,991

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by duby229 View Post
    it doesnt need to be repeatable. it needs to be actual gameplay. That is all that matters when benching games. You play games so gameplay on the newest release is what matters. MMOs should be benchmarked as such as often as releases are made.

    It's not hard to understand that games are meant to be played so gameplay is what should be benchmarked. Obviously gameplay is not exactly repeatable.
    If it isn't repeatable, it has questionable value. You can't tell whether it was an anomaly, a busy day on the server, or any other hiccup. Heck, you can't even tell whether anything was tested at all: if the test isn't repeatable, the writer could be pulling numbers out of his ass and nobody would be the wiser.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •