Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 71

Thread: Fedora 19 Alpha Gets Its First Delay Due To UEFI

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,919

    Default Fedora 19 Alpha Gets Its First Delay Due To UEFI

    Phoronix: Fedora 19 Alpha Gets Its First Delay Due To UEFI

    After a badly-delayed Fedora 18, Fedora 19 has already received its first release set-back...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTM0OTg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5

    Default UEFI sucks

    UEFi is terrible, it should been replaced by coreboot.
    Coreboot is sane, UEFI is not.
    Viva la coreboot!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    SuperUserLand
    Posts
    538

    Default

    and so it begins...


    f19 is going to be another fail like f18... I bet 20e that the alpha will be delayed again in a weeks time

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    593

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maksml View Post
    UEFi is terrible, it should been replaced by coreboot.
    Actually the more realistic approach is using coreboot for hardware initialization and UEFI on top of it. Google has worked towards this goal. It might be unfortunate but in not so distant future all x86 and ARM (at least AArch64 (64bit ARM)) devices will use UEFI.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    11

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Pallidus View Post
    and so it begins...


    f19 is going to be another fail like f18... I bet 20e that the alpha will be delayed again in a weeks time
    I hope it won't ;-) Alpha is pretty solid (for Alpha), except the UEFI bug. We even had possible workarounds (at least for the Grub2 one). But as UEFI is more wide spread, the impact could be bigger than before and especially the kernel bug could lead to really very broken system.

    And yes, the main reason why we said No-Go was - we don't want to loose our reputation of slipping!!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    287

    Default

    Who the hell decided UEFI problems get to block anything?! Currently its of tertiary significance. UEFI systems are in minority and the function can be disabled anyway. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    That's why I desperately need a way to install Gnome Shell 3.8 on Fedora 18! Please drop me a link if you you've stumbled upon a set of complete instructions please drop me a link.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    559

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bucic View Post
    Who the hell decided UEFI problems get to block anything?! Currently its of tertiary significance. UEFI systems are in minority and the function can be disabled anyway. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    That's why I desperately need a way to install Gnome Shell 3.8 on Fedora 18! Please drop me a link if you you've stumbled upon a set of complete instructions please drop me a link.
    Bull-freaking-shit.

    Any notebook or desktop motherboard bought after 2008 is loaded with UEFI and not BIOS.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sonadow View Post
    Bull-freaking-shit.

    Any notebook or desktop motherboard bought after 2008 is loaded with UEFI and not BIOS.
    Which one of my claims does this negate?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    696

    Default ;

    Quote Originally Posted by Bucic View Post
    Which one of my claims does this negate?
    You can't disable uefi, at best you can enable BIOS emulation on top of it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AJenbo View Post
    You can't disable uefi, at best you can enable BIOS emulation on top of it.
    I confused UEFI with the Secure Boot. Does the bug in question affect UEFI as a whole or just the SB?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •