Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: A New Set Of OpenGL Benchmarks Come To OpenBenchmarking

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,800

    Default A New Set Of OpenGL Benchmarks Come To OpenBenchmarking

    Phoronix: A New Set Of OpenGL Benchmarks Come To OpenBenchmarking

    FurMark, TessMark, and other advanced OpenGL 2.1/3.2/4.0 benchmarks are now available via the Phoronix Test Suite and OpenBenchmarking.org...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTM3MDM

  2. #2

    Default 32 bit?

    Did I oversee something or is there no 32 bit version of those benchmarks?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    989

    Default

    Great feature!! But I have more serious trouble with PTS... I don't understand how can I find list of uploaded results based on my criteria efficiently.

    For example,.. how to find all results for driver "radeon" with profile "Unigine Sanctuary" sorted newest first ? :/

    So for me, PTS is remarkably flexible testing solution, but its remarkably hard to compare them to existing, because finding similar is hard ...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    Posts
    136

    Default

    FYI, FurMark, Pixmark Piano, and Pixmark Volplosion all run on i965 with Mesa master if you do:
    export MESA_GL_VERSION_OVERRIDE=3.2
    export MESA_GLSL_VERSION_OVERRIDE=150

    So they ought to work properly with the next major release of Mesa.

    gimark and tessmark still don't work. I presume this is because they rely on geometry or tesselation shaders, but I haven't looked into the details.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,304

    Default

    Nice this is actually pretty exciting! Furmark is my go-to program for testing GPU overclocks and it has always annoyed me that I had to install Windows for 1 test.



    Michael:
    You should create a live CD for your PTS, based on some rolling release distro like gentoo or arch (so it's less to maintain). For many people like myself, installing the entire suite isn't really necessary and could actually be kinda a pain if we wanted to test it on multiple platforms. Maybe it could come with a few extra diagnostics like stress tests, sensor monitors, SMART tools, etc.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schmidtbag View Post
    Nice this is actually pretty exciting! Furmark is my go-to program for testing GPU overclocks and it has always annoyed me that I had to install Windows for 1 test.



    Michael:
    You should create a live CD for your PTS, based on some rolling release distro like gentoo or arch (so it's less to maintain). For many people like myself, installing the entire suite isn't really necessary and could actually be kinda a pain if we wanted to test it on multiple platforms. Maybe it could come with a few extra diagnostics like stress tests, sensor monitors, SMART tools, etc.
    Bad idea. The CD or USB port would become the bottleneck, and if you copied the entire distro to RAM then it would affect any RAM-sensative benchmarks

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kayden View Post
    FYI, FurMark, Pixmark Piano, and Pixmark Volplosion all run on i965 with Mesa master if you do:
    export MESA_GL_VERSION_OVERRIDE=3.2
    export MESA_GLSL_VERSION_OVERRIDE=150
    unfortunately same can not be said about r600 driver just yet. Setting those options for radeon driver made my cinnamon unbootable with Mesa master

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Doesn't seems to work for me:
    phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1305113-PTS-GPUTESTI20

    ERROR: You must enter at least one test, suite, or result identifier to run.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,304

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericg View Post
    Bad idea. The CD or USB port would become the bottleneck, and if you copied the entire distro to RAM then it would affect any RAM-sensative benchmarks
    I don't see how the CD or USB port would be a bottleneck unless the benchmark needs to reference the disk every once in a while in the middle of it's tests, in which case that particular benchmark could be cached before being run. It's a better idea than loading the entire image.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schmidtbag View Post
    Michael:
    You should create a live CD for your PTS, based on some rolling release distro like gentoo or arch (so it's less to maintain). For many people like myself, installing the entire suite isn't really necessary and could actually be kinda a pain if we wanted to test it on multiple platforms. Maybe it could come with a few extra diagnostics like stress tests, sensor monitors, SMART tools, etc.
    I've already done such: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...S+Desktop+Live

    I do have a much more compelling version to be publicly released before EOY assuming I find some more server mirrors. Since the last public PTS Desktop Live release I've done some custom engineering projects on it with more features but lack of bandwidth / mirrors has kept me from releasing them.

    There's also similar projects using PTS in this way like Gears On Gallium: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...tem&px=MTM1ODA

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •