Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Full DynTicks Proposed For Linux Kernel Integration

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,359

    Default Full DynTicks Proposed For Linux Kernel Integration

    Phoronix: Full DynTicks Proposed For Linux Kernel Integration

    Aside from the KVM pull request, another interesting proposed change for the Linux 3.10 kernel is the "full dynticks" support, also known as CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. Ingo Molnar is trying to get this brand new feature into the next Linux kernel release...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTM2NTA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,860

    Default

    Doesn't a tickless kernel also reduce power consumption because a tick kernel continually wakes up the CPU? (I could be totally wrong on this, hence the question mark)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,006

    Default Asynchronous CPU?

    Could this be useful on a asynchronous CPU?

    I wish there were more asynchronous CPUs on the market...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericg View Post
    Doesn't a tickless kernel also reduce power consumption because a tick kernel continually wakes up the CPU? (I could be totally wrong on this, hence the question mark)

    Basically yes.

    But in this particular case no. Because the dynticks feature already took care of disabling ticks when idling.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,860

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ragas View Post
    Basically yes.

    But in this particular case no. Because the dynticks feature already took care of disabling ticks when idling.
    Thanks Ragas, so no lowered power consumption really, but slightly better performance under some workloads. Still overall a net gain since we're moving away from ticked kernels as a design anyway, this is just extending it

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Serbia
    Posts
    44

    Default

    It's in:

    https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/ke...aed32f5db40264

    Will test as soon as rc1 is released.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericg View Post
    Thanks Ragas, so no lowered power consumption really, but slightly better performance under some workloads. Still overall a net gain since we're moving away from ticked kernels as a design anyway, this is just extending it
    Better performance means lower power, because the cpu can sit idling in a lower C state longer, since it has finished processing earlier.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •