Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 49

Thread: AMD Radeon Gallium3D More Competitive With Catalyst On Linux

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,937

    Default

    These are really good results!

    In many benchmarks, the 70-90% target has been reached, which is fantastic. There is a lag with ridiculously high FPS, which is expected and irrelevant, and in some games (Doom3, RQuake). But these games should be examined so specific bottlenecks causing the performance drops can be found and addressed.

    With UVD already here, GL3.3 around the corner, good performance, OpenCL progress and (hopefully) proper power management coming soon, this could be an amazing year for AMD users!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Rio de Janeiro
    Posts
    203

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    But that's what the freedesktop wiki is for.
    It's nearly there, but according to this:

    http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature#...Radeon_Drivers

    Radeon power management looks like done when its only static PM I suppose, and HDMI audio is marked as DONE for several generations, while AFAIK its not really on par with the windows driver yet, so something more subtle may be missing.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    308

    Default

    Awesome work, congratulation to the developers!

    Maybe by the time the OSS drivers are able to fully support Steam games (OpenGL wise) the OSS radeon drivers will be close enough to finally forget about catalyst and then i can upgrade to xorg-server 1.14. I still have a feeling there's a lot of performance optimizations left unfound or unpolished, but it's really awesome to see that it doing GL2 games running so well now. I'll have to try it in a few months (when this stuff is on Arch) and see how well Blender performs under the OSS drivers.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Russe, Bulgaria
    Posts
    543

    Default

    It would be nice if there was benchmark that could put drivers on their knees, for example....Heaven.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    731

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    These are really good results!

    In many benchmarks, the 70-90% target has been reached, which is fantastic. There is a lag with ridiculously high FPS, which is expected and irrelevant, and in some games (Doom3, RQuake). But these games should be examined so specific bottlenecks causing the performance drops can be found and addressed.

    With UVD already here, GL3.3 around the corner, good performance, OpenCL progress and (hopefully) proper power management coming soon, this could be an amazing year for AMD users!
    3.2 is more important. OSX use 3.2 excessively, and apps on Win are using DX (more likely). So people will tend to have 3.2 code paths for the sake of OSX compa. Games also should pick 3.2 (as this give 95% of Steam market...), while 4.x will still for some time be add-on, as it require up to date drivers on win, mean no osx support, and binarys on Lin.

    Yes 3.3 will mark "full" OpenGL support for class-DX11 hw, but otherwise 3.2 support is more important (and we will get them both in same mesa release at least for intel & r600g)

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    117

    Default

    Might be a good idea to benchmark games that people actually play.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,574

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by przemoli View Post
    Yes 3.3 will mark "full" OpenGL support for class-DX11 hw...
    Did you mean "DX10" ?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    261

    Default

    i just wonder where these improvements come from since...
    "R600g Tests Show Little Change On Mesa 9.2-devel"
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...tem&px=MTM1MzY

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,939

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jakubo View Post
    i just wonder where these improvements come from since...
    "R600g Tests Show Little Change On Mesa 9.2-devel"
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...tem&px=MTM1MzY
    Code clean ups maybe, bug fixes, things like that, Or maybe its just specific card generations (i didnt compare the two articles so for all i know they are the same cards in both).

    maybe someone through in a sleep(1) in the gfx stack as an april fools prank and it just got pulled out

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Russe, Bulgaria
    Posts
    543

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Did you mean "DX10" ?
    He probably meant DX11 features, which could be back-ported on DX10 class hardware.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •