Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: More Criticism Comes Towards Intel's Beignet OpenCL

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,235

    Default More Criticism Comes Towards Intel's Beignet OpenCL

    Phoronix: More Criticism Comes Towards Intel's Beignet OpenCL

    Yesterday was marked by the first release of Beignet, an open-source Linux OpenCL solution for Intel Ivy Bridge hardware, however it has drawn criticism by open-source developers...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTM1MzM

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Drivers are a product. Intel writes drivers themselves and is responsible for quality of their driver to their consumers (non-corporate open source developers don't have that responsibility - they are just scratching their own itch - you like my software - great! you don't - too bad!). How can you claim responsibility for something you have no control over? If I were businness manager at Intel I would do it separately as well - I wouldn't want to be held responsible by my superriors for mistakes of other people not under me. I bet that is one of the reasons Intel does it themselves instead of relying on existing open source framework that from their perspective has a life on its own.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Your stance is as valid as intel saying they won't release anything for Linux, since they don't control Linux.

    How long have you been working for intel?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Intel are the knights who say NIH. The only positive thing is that thanks to the vast amount of resources they pour into it, they have the best quality open source drivers.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,052

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by remm View Post
    Intel are the knights who say NIH. The only positive thing is that thanks to the vast amount of resources they pour into it, they have the best quality open source drivers.
    I think you mean "Nee".

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,052

    Default

    The solution to this problem is simple; nobody is forced to include the intel drivers in their distro. If Intel doesn't get the message and tries to insist on their own ugly approach, then one would think that if Red Hat put their foot down on this issue, Intel would be forced to yield. I'm sure that the biggest revenue that Intel gains from "Linux" is via enterprise customers running RHEL, which really makes it important for Intel to take the hint.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •