Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Liquorix 3.8 Kernel Has Some Performance Wins Over Linux

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    What are you talking about, Windows XP was notorious for that problem. They have seemed to solve it with Vista/7, though.
    they don't. i have it every day on my win 7 work laptop.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
    Posts
    607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by a user View Post
    they don't. i have it every day on my win 7 work laptop.
    confirmed, it's slightly improved in Windows 8 but still pretty bad compared to a Linux Desktop with BFS + BFQ & some tweaks (minutes vs. several seconds where you entirely can't use your box)

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    911

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kernelOfTruth View Post
    confirmed, it's slightly improved in Windows 8 but still pretty bad compared to a Linux Desktop with BFS + BFQ & some tweaks (minutes vs. several seconds where you entirely can't use your box)
    Can you please point me how do you "tweak" this out, if ,say, you compile kernel on your own?

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,913

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by a user View Post
    they don't. i have it every day on my win 7 work laptop.
    Yeah, it's probably just that my win 7 machine has a lot more memory than my old xp machine had. I don't think it's trashing the page file anymore.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •