Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Ubuntu 13.04 Linux Can Outperform Apple OS X 10.8.3

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,903

    Default Ubuntu 13.04 Linux Can Outperform Apple OS X 10.8.3

    Phoronix: Ubuntu 13.04 Linux Can Outperform Apple OS X 10.8.3

    In the road to the release of Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" later this month will be a number of articles benchmarking this major Linux distribution update against its friends and competitors. To complement the Ubuntu 13.04 benchmarks already delivered, including Microsoft Windows 7 and Windows 8 benchmarks, here are tests of Apple's OS X 10.8.3 operating system on a MacBook Pro compared to Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS, Ubuntu 12.10, and the latest Ubuntu 13.04 (post Beta 2) state. Ubuntu 13.04 is generally competitive with OS X 10.8 and in some new areas is now beating out Apple's operating system on their own hardware.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=18627

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    70

    Default

    Fuck results.
    Apple fanboyism >> technical and perf superiority of Linux.

    And Apple is soooo much better. It made me give up my typewriter.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    19

    Default

    What about power consumption?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    771

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sovok_kpss View Post
    What about power consumption?
    What about level of gayness? OSX outperforms anything in this benchmark.

  5. #5

    Default

    I'm not sure OS X GPU benchmarks of Ironlake are meaningful. Ironlake was slower than the previous MacBook Pro IGP, the 9400M, so Apple never implemented it as a standalone IGP for the 13" MacBook Pro, Mac Mini or iMac unlike the 9400M or the later HD3000/HD4000. It was only ever implemented in a switchable configuration for power savings where the OS automatically switches to the discrete GPU under any reasonable GPU load so the Ironlake GPU driver isn't likely performance optimized. Apple doesn't even acknowledge the existence of Ironlake as a targetable GPU to developers unlike the Intel GMA 950, X3000, HD3000, HD400 and nVidia 9400M and 320M which were available in standalone configurations so are going to need driver development effort.

    https://developer.apple.com/graphics...Info_1075.html
    https://developer.apple.com/graphics...ies/index.html

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Cologne, Germany
    Posts
    308

    Wink Some maths

    Which is not hard, because OS X is even more a bloatware than Ubuntu is.

    And because bloat(OS X) > bloat(Ubuntu) and we have the relation speed(OS) = 1 / bloat(OS), this test yields to the expected results.

    Now seriously: Apple has really let go with its Desktop Operating System. It is a joke and starting with Snow Leopard was one of the main reasons I switched to Gentoo.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    470

    Default

    What an absolute useless pile of dung comparison set. No one at Apple gives a rat's ass about Phoronix's Test Suite, never mind comparing start up times of HFS+ and Ext4.

    Seriously, this is actually embarrassing for Linux.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60

    Default Better tests

    I would like to see more useful tests:
    - compile times (same compiler)
    - SunSpider & other JavaScript benchmarks (of the same codebase of-course)
    - Unigine & other modern 3D engines running at high resolutions.

    And why?
    - Add Ubuntu's tests compiled under LLVM

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    441

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marc Driftmeyer View Post
    What an absolute useless pile of dung comparison set. No one at Apple gives a rat's ass about Phoronix's Test Suite, never mind comparing start up times of HFS+ and Ext4.

    Seriously, this is actually embarrassing for Linux.
    There was no comparison of start up times, the comparison was of archive unpack times. I doubt there is much embarrassment at performing significantly better.

    Having said that, you are probably right that people at Apple aren't so concerned about absolute performance figures, since very few Mac buyers will make a purchase decision on that basis.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    SuperUserLand
    Posts
    538

    Default

    Phoronix used to have ACTUALLY relevant tests like h264 encoding

    WHAT HAPPENED?




    Quote Originally Posted by snadrus View Post
    I would like to see more useful tests:
    - compile times (same compiler)
    - SunSpider & other JavaScript benchmarks (of the same codebase of-course)
    - Unigine & other modern 3D engines running at high resolutions.

    And why?
    - Add Ubuntu's tests compiled under LLVM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •