Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: Why Canonical Is Using Android Drivers For Ubuntu Mir

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,637

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droidhacker View Post
    The four big mobile gpu's are Adreno, Mali, tegra, and powervr.... ordered from most functional open source to least. Keep left.
    Yeap. Right now it's most likely that Jolla's first phone will be using a Mali (due to their partnerships).
    If anyone was to ever fork or rewrite Lima at some point, they should totally call it "Armali"

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    94

    Default

    It seems to me that regardless of whatever marketing speak Canonical paints over this, it makes quite a bit of sense if they REALLY plan on putting Mir in "production" as soon I think I remember was stated early on (i.e. in the next year). Even if they had started trying to negotiate their own drivers as soon as they decided to go with Mir, I just don't see them getting their own special drivers in time for rollout.

    I don't know if it is necessary or even possible for backport hacking to be done so that the drivers will work on cutting edge kernels, but I'm guessing that's their plan.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheOne View Post
    I actually see Canonical's move as a smart one, look how many years it took for the linux kernel to have some decent video drivers shipped by mainstream hardware vendors.

    I think this will actually even help ubuntu and other distros that adopt Mir (if any) on the desktop side. Lets take for example the raspberry pi. It has a mali 400 quad core video chip, now imagine running the desktop environment with hardware accelerated graphics, everything would run faster.

    If things go well, we will have an era where replacing typical x86/x64 desktops with low power arm counterparts would be much easier. Take a look at the odroid-u2: http://www.hardkernel.com/renewal_20...=G135341370451 that piece of hardware runs ubuntu smoothly, consumes little power, small and powerful. Now imaging the possibilities if we could use existing android drivers, you could take any cellphone and convert it to a desktop pc with good performance running a full fledge linux software stack.

    We shouldn't be haters or fanboys but take a look at things with an open mind (even if the drivers source code isn't open).
    raspberry pi does not have mali. It has a BCM2835 broadcom videocore. And yes, it does work with accelerated UI, using evil "driver is entirely hidden in firmware" approach.

    And BTW: odroid u2 is on a totally different playing field from raspberry pi. Raspberry pi has a crappy single core 700. odroid u2 has a quad-core cortex A9, with a, yes, this one actually does have a Mali.
    Last edited by droidhacker; 04-09-2013 at 12:18 PM.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    892

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pdffs View Post
    Obviously if even Google couldn't force hardware vendors to provide open drivers,
    Could you please share the link to the source of that claim? I dont think they at least care even a bit about opensource drivers. If not the oposite.



    To the news, I found the title funny, because I did ask myself never that question, but I did not read here anything about that Mir will be compatible or uses android driver architecture.

    So I would have liked as title more something like: "Canonicals Mir is using Android drivers" or somethign like that.
    I need no Canonical dev say some marketing blabla about it, to know why they want that.
    If you as company care 0 about free software, free drivers and so on, of course you would like to be able to use all the arm non-free drivers.

    If you have not to sell your "product" because of openess or freeness, you just can switch from closedsource support drivers (too) into closedsource drivers only from now on, a complete closed plattform.
    From now on I think I call Ubuntu not anymore (GNU)Ubuntu/Linux, but Ubuntu/Android so Ubuntu is now a Android distribution, basicly.

    And they should not say some stupid about the architecture, its because they can use the closed source drivers, thats the reason the only reason for that move.

    So I am to lazy to scandalize that, I will make my desition based on that desitions and maybe some are able to guess what that is.
    Last edited by blackiwid; 04-09-2013 at 12:28 PM.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droidhacker View Post
    raspberry pi does not have mali. It has a BCM2835 broadcom videocore. And yes, it does work with accelerated UI, using evil "driver is entirely hidden in firmware" approach.

    And BTW: odroid u2 is on a totally different playing field from raspberry pi. Raspberry pi has a crappy single core 700. odroid u2 has a quad-core cortex A9, with a, yes, this one actually does have a Mali.
    Ahh, thanks for clearing that out don't know where the heck I read it was a mali 400 it seems it happened to me the same as this guy: http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/vi...hp?f=24&t=7485

    I'm looking forward for a future of energy efficiency computers and it seems ARM has the lead for now. Want to buy an odroid u2 but with all this stupid war threats and stuff is kind of risky to order one since it is manufactured on south Korea.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    187

    Default

    If I'm correct, Mir would use the same approach as Wayland to get up and running on Android drivers through libhybris. Maybe that's an oversimplification, but for people who think this is somehow Mir's secret weapon, there's nothing to keep Wayland from the same approach. So we don't need Mir to run the traditional Linux stack (GTK & Qt in particular) on the broad range of mobile devices.

    On the other hand, I get the feeling that running all of the same software on an Android GPU would give you some issues. Would Blender 'just work', for instance? Consider how Intel's GPU drivers on Mesa used to have issues and still do with some advanced features, like acceleration in VMWare and VirtualBox (probably not necessarily Intel's fault). Still, you see where I'm going with this- can we really use all the same software, even with XWayland/XMir? If so, count me in for a future in ARM.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,286

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scionicspectre View Post
    On the other hand, I get the feeling that running all of the same software on an Android GPU would give you some issues. Would Blender 'just work', for instance?
    Likely not. Many mobile GPUs only support GL ES, and even those that would support real/desktop GL, the Android drivers are ES only.

    That is, unless Blender has a GL ES port.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scionicspectre View Post
    ...
    can we really use all the same software, even with XWayland/XMir? If so, count me in for a future in ARM.
    I guess we will have to wait to see if Canonical's offerings triumph or become a major league disaster. I guess that part of success will be if open source developers update the source of many critical applications to use newer technologies Wayland/Mir replacing X.

    On the raspberry pi side, xbmc was ported to work with GL ES as Open Arena, it all depends on developers motivation to do it.
    Last edited by TheOne; 04-09-2013 at 03:27 PM.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Seem reasonable to me. I guess quite a lot of ubuntu phone early users will be enthusiast that flash it on a android phone (even after the first actual ubuntu phones come out), and what easier way to support more phones than being able to use their android drivers.

    I will at least keep an eye on ubuntu phone and sailfish, I want something more like maemo (that is, something a little bit more in line with linux desktops). I think there very well might be a small market made up by tech enthusiast for one of these, at least as 3d party roms for other androids.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Maemo on N900 refused 3D drivers b/c of the closed-source reason. Ubuntu made it big with great 3D on closed drivers before they became open, so I'd think the same will happen in mobile.
    Since Mir (as opposed to SurfaceFlinger) provides C/C++ bindings to these 3D drivers, we can finally get the most out of ARM hardware.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •