Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 72

Thread: KDE & Xfce Don't Lead To Performance Wins Over Windows 8

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kingston, Jamaica
    Posts
    311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adarion View Post
    WTF?

    1. The test conditions / setup box is as always unreadably small and must be scrolled.
    2. From what I am reading there it is using an intel chip.
    3. What the hell is this "test"? It is comparing the driver implementation for intel chips on Windows and Linux. Doesn't really have that much to do with the desktop environment.
    Please try to read and comprehend the article.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Calinou View Post
    Don't forget the article is talking about Intel graphics, which are known for being slower on Linux than on Windows. Do the same with a NVIDIA graphics card and the performance will pretty much be the same. 8)
    Indeed -

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag..._nvidia1&num=5

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rural Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,030

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stqn View Post
    Thanks for the article. I hope in the future it will be possible to benchmark more “mainstream” games, games from the Humble Bundles maybe (yes, some of them are slow), Valve/steam games, or popular Windows games under Wine.
    Name recognition is not the problem here - it is about verifiability. The games here are known to be solid and use the same back-ends (for the most part) on both Linux and Windows, and therefore are better for benchmarking the driver. Benchmarking a game under Wine would be a huge joke as the fact that it is not native would put overhead on Linux simply because it is not being ran natively. This is not about showing what games you can run on your Intel cards, but rather the state of the drivers.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    373

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamish Wilson View Post
    Name recognition is not the problem here - it is about verifiability. The games here are known to be solid and use the same back-ends (for the most part) on both Linux and Windows, and therefore are better for benchmarking the driver. Benchmarking a game under Wine would be a huge joke as the fact that it is not native would put overhead on Linux simply because it is not being ran natively. This is not about showing what games you can run on your Intel cards, but rather the state of the drivers.
    You state your opinions as if they were the ultimate truth, but they aren’t.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rural Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,030

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stqn View Post
    You state your opinions as if they were the ultimate truth, but they aren’t.
    Care to actually respond to my "opinions" then?

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    It doesnt have enough benchmarks to really show the state of the drivers. It doesnt show how it performs with wine. It doesnt show how it performs with Unigine engine. It doesnt show how it performs with any steam game.

    All it shows is on the benchmarks run the linux Intel driver is sometimes slower than the windows Intel driver. But that isnt what the article title says. That is not what the conclusion says.

  7. #57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ua=42 View Post
    Well, check this out http://jaysonrowe.blogspot.com/2013/...kde-users.html . Basically it's a bad default setting in KDE. KDE should change the default. Micheal's tests shows that when the default KDE is used, it under-performs compared to the other desktops with their defaults.
    These tests were with the suspended desktop effects for full-screen windows.

  8. #58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stqn View Post
    Thanks for the article. I hope in the future it will be possible to benchmark more “mainstream” games, games from the Humble Bundles maybe (yes, some of them are slow), Valve/steam games, or popular Windows games under Wine.
    New PTS/OpenBenchmarking.org test profiles are happily accepted.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    These tests were with the suspended desktop effects for full-screen windows.
    Hi Michael, if you'll see the top of my blog post, Martin Gräßlin who is the Kwin and Compositor maintainer for KDE told me that simply suspending desktop effects for full-screen windows doesn't have that much effect. You should try either doing alt+shift+f12 to disable compositing, or Alt+F3 -> More Actions -> Special Window Settigns -> Appearance & Fixes and enable block compositing/force/yes which will basically create a "rule" that whenever that game is started, compositing will be suspended completely automatically (basically the same thing as alt+shift_f12, but you don't have to remember to do it each time).

    Once I did this, I really noticed a difference.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,621

    Default

    Here I tested 3 cards with all Killing Floor renderes on Highest. Pretty interesting I would say...

    http://steamcommunity.com/app/221410...4089658431267/

    Of course I used KDE 4.8 with Kanotix.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •