Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 72

Thread: KDE & Xfce Don't Lead To Performance Wins Over Windows 8

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pawlerson View Post
    Where I need to to put this?
    This may be useful to you when using source engine based games

    https://developer.valvesoftware.com/...e_Command_List

    Or SS3

    http://www.serioussam.wikia.com/wiki...nsole_Commands
    Last edited by DDF420; 03-23-2013 at 09:06 PM.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DDF420 View Post
    This may be useful to you when using source engine based games

    https://developer.valvesoftware.com/...e_Command_List

    Or SS3

    http://www.serioussam.wikia.com/wiki...nsole_Commands
    Nice! Thank you!

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DDF420 View Post
    This may be useful to you when using source engine based games

    https://developer.valvesoftware.com/...e_Command_List

    Or SS3

    http://www.serioussam.wikia.com/wiki...nsole_Commands
    Thanks a lot!

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    Here I tested 3 cards with all Killing Floor renderes on Highest. Pretty interesting I would say...

    http://steamcommunity.com/app/221410...4089658431267/

    Of course I used KDE 4.8 with Kanotix.
    It seems this game isn't optimized for Linux. We'll see how L4D2 will perform.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by j2723 View Post
    Michael, could you do similar benchmarks for other Distributions? Would be interesting...
    Goal! Unfortunately, Phoronix use only Ubuntu with all of its package dependences and not pure neccessary processes. Try use light distros like Archlinux, Debian or Gentoo and light WM/DE in comparison with complex distros like Fedora, OpenSuse, Mandriva, Mageia, (some)Ubuntu etc. I insist on that light distros wit light WM/DE can run more quickly than full Ubuntu installation. Why? Compare system load and communication with HW an you will see. You may also compile a special testing distro with minimum of GUI (apps and frontends needed only) to get "net" results.
    Last edited by pjezek; 03-31-2013 at 11:43 AM.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    63

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pjezek View Post
    Goal! Unfortunately, Phoronix use only Ubuntu with all of its package dependences and not pure neccessary processes. Try use light distros like Archlinux, Debian or Gentoo and light WM/DE in comparison with complex distros like Fedora, OpenSuse, Mandriva, Mageia, (some)Ubuntu etc. I insist on that light distros wit light WM/DE can run more quickly than full Ubuntu installation. Why? Compare system load and communication with HW an you will see. You may also compile a special testing distro with minimum of GUI (apps and frontends needed only) to get "net" results.
    The issue here is open vs closed driver performances. Comparison of stock ubuntu with stock windows 8 seems fair, specially for most users. Comparisons of unity with lights WM/DE (Xfce, LDXE, OpenBox...) are available at phoronix and they do not run quickly. The same as a comparison of ubuntu to Archlinux: Arch speed advantages are minimal.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by juanrga View Post
    The issue here is open vs closed driver performances. Comparison of stock ubuntu with stock windows 8 seems fair, specially for most users. Comparisons of unity with lights WM/DE (Xfce, LDXE, OpenBox...) are available at phoronix and they do not run quickly. The same as a comparison of ubuntu to Archlinux: Arch speed advantages are minimal.
    Yup - exactly. I just moved from Kubuntu 13.04 to Arch. Yes, the desktop feels snappier, but performance in games is almost identical. I even tried w/ Xfce4 first before loading KDE. No difference really between distros or window managers.

    That being said, I do like Arch, and plan to keep it on this machine long term for other reasons, but *not* for better performance in games.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Indore
    Posts
    18

    Default

    I can not believe this that windows 8 doing better but heard lot about this kind of stuff

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    63

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jaysonrowe View Post
    Yup - exactly. I just moved from Kubuntu 13.04 to Arch. Yes, the desktop feels snappier, but performance in games is almost identical. I even tried w/ Xfce4 first before loading KDE. No difference really between distros or window managers.

    That being said, I do like Arch, and plan to keep it on this machine long term for other reasons, but *not* for better performance in games.
    I was just ready to install Arch, the installation guide is still on my desk, but finally I decided not to do it after I checked some additional facts such as the issue of the speed. Actually I find no reason to switch to Arch. Could I ask you what reasons are guiding you to keep it? if this is not a too personal question of course.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rural Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,032

    Default

    I can't speak for him, but my reasons for using Arch are that it is a rolling release, it has the flexibility of the AUR, and the fact it allows me to know every single package I put on my computer. So it is mostly for Linux control freaks.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •