Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 59

Thread: GNOME 3.8 Release Candidate Now Available

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,438

    Default GNOME 3.8 Release Candidate Now Available

    Phoronix: GNOME 3.8 Release Candidate Now Available

    GNOME 3.7.92 has been released, a.k.a. the release candidate for GNOME 3.8...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTMzMjk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,447

    Default

    I tried gnome 3 the other day for the first time, in virtualbox, and I gotta say I don't hate it. It isn't my cup of tea and I find it relatively slow to work with on a desktop but I think it makes a very nice tablet DE. What bothers me most about it is how it seems to be equally as restricting as a jailbroken iOS, and I don't like how fallback mode is now removed. I also think shading should be enabled by default, since you can't minimize anything.

    However, considering GNOME 3's hardware demands and the fact it isn't practical outside of casual PC/tablet usage, I do not think it should qualify as the linux default anymore. I strongly feel XFCE should take the new title of linux default, considering how balanced it is in usability, performance, compatibility, and features.

    I think the reason GNOME 3 is hated so much is because it isn't really GNOME anymore, just as how Windows 8 doesn't feel like Windows anymore. I'm sure there'd be a lot less hate for GNOME 3 if it had a completely different name, and if it didn't lack so many features that even Windows 95 would have.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    132

    Default

    But in the contrary, is not bad as a desktop DE and is very keyboard friendly so you cant work without touching to mouch the mouse (more fast).

    EDIT: there is no fallback mode, but there is a 'classic mode' with maintained core classic extensions.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    Gnome 3.8. The version at which gnome died. Since there is no more fallback gnome will see another decline in user numbers.
    I'm not sure if there would be a decline. I don't see the appeal of Gnome 3 without using it's standard interface, otherwise you might as well use XFCE or Cinnamon where you get basically the same experience but with more customization. Besides, it isn't necessarily a bad thing that gnome is removing fallback mode because it helps get people with the ancient crappy hardware to move on. As I see it, pretty much any 64 bit compatible (x86) system should be capable of running GNOME 3 just fine, with the exception of VIA users. You could argue that fallback mode would be necessary if your GPU drivers fail, but IIRC, LLVM is supposed to be a quick temporary fix for that. When I tried GNOME 3 I didn't have the GPU drivers installed and it was running relatively smooth; it was usable, I'll put it that way.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    60

    Default

    A few hours ago I gave Gnome 3 another spin... and now I'm back to KDE.

    The performance of Gnome 3 is unacceptable on my Laptop, it kind of "lags" when moving windows (enough to consider it a nuisance). Gnome "classic" seemed to have the same problem, and it felt very very incomplete to me.

    Is Gnome "classic" fallback mode?

    Anyhow, I can't wait for Gnome 4 .
    Last edited by j2723; 03-21-2013 at 03:58 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by j2723 View Post
    A few hours ago I gave Gnome 3 another spin... and now I'm back to KDE.

    The performance of Gnome 3 is unacceptable on my Laptop, it kind of "lags" when moving windows (enough to consider it a nuisance). Gnome "classic" seemed to have the same problem, and it felt very very incomplete to me.

    Is Gnome "classic" fallback mode?
    There's no longer a 2d "fallback mode". In gnome 3.8, "gnome classic" is gnome-shell with a more "classic" gnome2-like layout, but its still gnome-shell and needs 3d acceleration.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bwat47 View Post
    There's no longer a 2d "fallback mode". In gnome 3.8, "gnome classic" is gnome-shell with a more "classic" gnome2-like layout, but its still gnome-shell and needs 3d acceleration.
    That probably explains the "lags" I was experiencing.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    290

    Default

    I hope there will be a way to easily install Gnome 3.8 on Fedora before Fedora 19 gets released...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bucic View Post
    I hope there will be a way to easily install Gnome 3.8 on Fedora before Fedora 19 gets released...
    Are you having problems installing gnome on fedora now? Fedora is actually where I tried it out earlier this week and I didn't get any problems. It took a really long time to install but it was successful.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by j2723 View Post
    That probably explains the "lags" I was experiencing.
    It depends. Mutter tries to do fancy shit with VSync, and fails at it with some proprietary drivers. Mostly on AMD hardware, but I've seen it happen on Nvidia as well. When things aren't working right, everything feels all "floaty" like your iterations are a few frames behind your actual inputs. It's pretty easy to fix though.

    That aside, the one thing that can be said for the Gnome team (and their cousins working on Cinnamon and Pantheon) is that they know how to design a good looking system. I use and love Dynamic Activities, which is one of the main reasons I don't really like KDE, Unity, or Xfce. Unity isn't an option for me (I use Arch) and Xfce doesn't have the nice features of Gnome, at least not with Gnome's elegance (system settings, applications search, overview, etc). KDE (like Enlightenment) is very ugly IMO. Way too many slow and "shiny" effects everywhere, tons of inconsistent multi-colored icons all over, etc. I don't like everything about Gnome's design, but they at least understand how to use Minimalisn, Whitespace, and Consistency.

    Most peoples complaints about Gnome are due to missing features (like no "taskbar"), but most, if not all, of those are fixable with Extensions (like "Dash to Dock"). Granted I do agree they sometimes go a bit overboard, and I do think they should build in some more advanced default settings to enable the most commonly requested features (again, like the missing taskbar, and natulius features). That said, I've installed stock Gnome Shell on both my Mother and Grandmother's machines, and both of them didn't have any problems understanding how to use the system. Indeed, gnome's design kept there computers much cleaner (no desktop icons everywhere confusing them, no way to fudge up system settings, etc). They understood how to change basic settings cause Gnome's settings area is so basic, and they instantly understood how to access apps and switch windows. They even really liked the overview area as a way to get to their "background" windows (over the "listed on taskbar" concept Windows 7 uses) cause it makes visual sense when you see all the windows zoom out.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •