Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 52

Thread: Differences Between X.Org, Wayland & Mir

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    347

    Default

    if canonical wants to make a uber-awesome desktop maybe they should start working in getting rid of that putrid brown sepia theme.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    970

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garegin View Post
    if canonical wants to make a uber-awesome desktop maybe they should start working in getting rid of that putrid brown sepia theme.
    They have switched from the brown theme with 10.04 LTS. Not that I think the new one is better, but I would think that is a matter of taste.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    They have switched from the brown theme with 10.04 LTS. Not that I think the new one is better, but I would think that is a matter of taste.
    The new theme is terrible too, at least gnome 3 looks sane even though its usability is utter rubbish.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    64

    Unhappy

    So, one the one hand they're promoting that they're using Google's Protobuf for IPC, on the other hand they're saying they, unlike Wayland, don't really care about IPC, but about creating some awesome "thingy" that's useful ("unlike Wayland").
    Does anyone else see the irony in this? Also, could this get any more technical? "Thingy", really?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    55

    Default

    the author use "things" a bit everywhere and it shows a lack of understanding.

    he's also trying to expose mir as better because mir "includes ipc, libraries AND graphic toolkit AND you have no choice but to use THEIR toolkit". He also makes clear that ANYONE trying to implement their toolkit on top regardless will get broken by their change, and dare I say, probably voluntarily. i.e. it's mir's ubuntu way or the highway (or, punt intended, wayland.)

    That's why KDE/GNOME will not go on mir. There is no point. Half of KDE/GNOME is the graphical toolkit (which does more than that, too): QT & GTK.

    Mir also seems to admit they're also not good enough to implement their own ipc, so they use protobuf. hey that's fine, but don't go touting that it's because you're better, if it's because you just don't wanna roll your own.

    Oh yeah, and "artistic" differences, I mean, that makes me so confident. Seems like mir is another upstart.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    California
    Posts
    254

    Default We're the way of the world!



    Get used to it!

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    555

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    Neither Nvidia nor AMD are developing their drivers for the consumer, both companies are developing for the professional user in the first place, having support for consumer cards mostly as a byproduct (this may change with more games coming to Linux, but we have to wait and see). Professional users tend to be more conservative and are, AFAIK, rather running distributions like RHEL or SLED/S, so it is more likely that Wayland will be the first target for proprietary drivers. But since both solutions, Wayland and Mir, seem to use EGL drivers this shouldn't be a major problem.
    It was this way till Valve jumped in.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    943

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pawlerson View Post
    It was this way till Valve jumped in.
    It will continue to be that way until valve proves it is likely to provide a larger revenue stream. That may be a hard sell, even if they sell a lot of systems, workstation cards are expensive, while valve is probably going to try to cut expenses by negotiating a deal to cut prices.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by balouba View Post
    Seems like mir is another upstart.
    Although Upstart was started at a time when it was needed, and it's just that it's been supplanted by something better since.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    970

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pawlerson View Post
    It was this way till Valve jumped in.
    We would like to have it that way, no question, but it simply isn't. Nvidia and AMD don't care about the 2% Linux gamers, which mostly own cheap mid-range cards or below (I know, before they all chime in, there are exceptions, people using faster/expensive cards, but how many are they, 5% of the those 2%?). They care about professionals, with cards where one card is more than 1000$, sometimes even a multiple of that, those that bring the reputation in the business market.
    This may change in the future, but we have to see if it really happens.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •