Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 vs. AMD Radeon Graphics On Linux

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,638

    Default Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 vs. AMD Radeon Graphics On Linux

    Phoronix: Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 vs. AMD Radeon Graphics On Linux

    Already published on Phoronix have been Intel HD Graphics 4600 benchmarks on Ubuntu Linux from the Intel Core i7 4770K "Haswell" processor and compared against previous generations of Intel HD Graphics. Being benchmarked today is the Intel HD Graphics 4600 on Linux compared against various AMD Radeon graphics cards using both the open and closed-source graphics drivers.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=18794

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    657

    Default

    Again only the old 3d Applications ....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    16

    Default

    It would be interesting to see AMD Richland compared as well, to get a comparison against the integrated graphics of Intel's competitor.

    Also, OpenCL.

  4. #4

    Default

    R600sb not used yet again. I think the benchmarks would be more worthwhile if you enabled it for the cards that support it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108

    Default

    I do not understand anything. Are all those AMD discrete cards? Where are the APU's?

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sykobee View Post
    It would be interesting to see AMD Richland compared as well, to get a comparison against the integrated graphics of Intel's competitor.
    If only AMD would send out the hardware...

    Quote Originally Posted by sykobee View Post
    Also, OpenCL.
    Intel OpenCL (Beignet) really doesn't work yet..

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nille View Post
    Again only the old 3d Applications ....
    TIL Xonotic is an old 3D application.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    158

    Default

    So it looks like for an open source solution, the Ivy "R" CPUs might be the best choice overall, with the 5200.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    232

    Default

    Great article! Its nice to see how the OSS radeon gfx are fast approaching speed parity with the closed-source solution. One thing that would be interesting is a compatibility test between OSS & Closed Drivers on Radeon. On Ubuntu 13.04, I tried the OSS drivers on my 4670 card, and was very dismayed that many games were just not compatible with it (ie. would crash or just not load), especially many of the HiB games as well as many Wine games.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    534

    Default

    Beautifu, thanksl! I know you don't have an a10-6800k handy, but i would be nice to compare Haswell against with the Radeon HD 7660D from the AMD APUs, perhaps against the a10-5800k. Same thing: open source and closed source, for Catalyst

    It is great to see how the open source stack progressed for AMD, though Intel is ways ahead (it is fast, and rich in features, I think that made my choice for my next processor, since I only need moderate graphics, and an APU is enough - i5 haswell seems to hit the spot for me).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •