Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: OverlayFS File-System Proposed For Linux 3.10 Kernel

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,805

    Default OverlayFS File-System Proposed For Linux 3.10 Kernel

    Phoronix: OverlayFS File-System Proposed For Linux 3.10 Kernel

    The Overlay File-System has been in development for several years and is used by some notable Linux distributions, but has yet to be merged into the mainline Linux kernel after having to be pulled a few times in the past. The new plan is to merge OverlayFS for the Linux 3.10 kernel...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTMyNzA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,626

    Default

    Wow, that really took long. I would have liked when aufs was added as that's what i prefer to use but if overlayfs is mainline this is also fine. Currently no mainline kernel can be used to create fast live systems. There is a workaround userspace tool called unionfs-fuse but it is so slow that nobody can really consider it. Fedora used another way to implement the live mode but that seemed a bit more restrictive as the amount of free space did not seem to rely on the ram installed.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,048

    Default

    What implementations of union overlay are there out there?

    Does not Linux already have support for union overlay?

    Plan 9 from Bell Labs have support for union mounts, I think it originated from there, it was the first OS with support for union mount and was invented and introduced there.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,626

    Default

    Informer many live systems used unionfs and later aufs and Ubuntu is now using overlayfs. Of course I can not test all other live systems but at least i know the most important ones.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    822

    Default

    Actually union mounts were the favored solution of the kernel VFS maintainers. But the union mounts project was abandoned by its developer, which lead to the aufs maintainer to request inclusion of aufs and overlayfs in the kernel:
    Quote Originally Posted by J. R. Okajima
    Actually overlayfs is union-type-filesystem as aufs, instead of union-type-mount.
    If the development of UnionMount is really stopped, then I'd ask people to consider merging aufs as well as overlayfs.
    iirc, Fedora uses LVM writable snapshot with memory backed VG. All other distros use overlayfs, aufs or unionfs for their live media.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Elsewhere
    Posts
    90

    Default

    Hehe... looks like Michael has found a way to defeat ad blockers .

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,891

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VinzC View Post
    Hehe... looks like Michael has found a way to defeat ad blockers .
    If you use AdBlockPlus then it automatically allows in non-intrusive advertising-- text adds, static images, things like that. It only really blocks audio/video/gif/flash ads which is fine by me because those are the worst.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    23

    Default

    On my home server, I use mhddfs to pool together various disparate hard drives into one combined volume. It's based on FUSE so it's not the most efficient solution out there, but it works very well for me. Plus, it has the advantage of automatically choosing the filesystem where a file will be written, depending on the free space available.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •