Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: GhostBSD 3.0 Lets You Relive GNOME 2 On BSD

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TestingTe View Post
    Well I did submit a bug report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54191

    That's about as much as I know how to do ^.^"
    Didn't mean to double-post O.o

    Sorry ^.^"

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    389

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CthuIhux View Post
    In BSD, any C program that has an fclose(NULL) will crash while of Linux, it does not.
    It's nothing wrong with that according to standard and it's easier to debug programs this way.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    512

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CthuIhux View Post
    Looks like we have a BSD fucker here. Fuck off and come back when you start using Linux
    Did you not see the board on Phoronix 'BSD, Mac OS X, Hurd & Others' where you are currently posting in?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    985

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CthuIhux View Post
    In BSD, any C program that has an fclose(NULL) will crash while of Linux, it does not.
    Basically this means nothing more than "Linux has support for people that are to dumb to program correctly, while BSD has not."

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    210

    Default

    Now this may explain something.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CthuIhux View Post
    Looks like we have a BSD ****** here. **** off and come back when you start using Linux
    Erm....dude.... useless h8 is useless.

    The comment on the kernel alone showed I keep up with both GNU/Linux and FreeBSD.

    And explaining why GhostBSD was made and my thoughts on PC-BSD is about as relevant as explaining why Bodhi was made and my thoughts on Mint.

    --sent from my made-to-be-GNU-friendly Gentoo GNU/Linux laptop

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    263

    Default

    For those who are thinking they forked FreeBSD to run gnome2:
    GhostBSD is not new; it's an established (though rather minor?) project making a GNOME/FreeBSD livecd.

    Also, for CthuIhux:
    You sure?
    Code:
    idunham@Caracal:/tmp$ cat fclose.c
    #include <stdio.h>
    int main()
    {
            int i;
            i=fclose(0);
            return i;
    }
    Caracal:/tmp$ make fclose
    cc     fclose.c   -o fclose
    Caracal:/tmp$ ./fclose
    Segmentation fault
    Caracal:/tmp$  lsb_release -a
    LSB Version:    core-2.0-ia32:core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-ia32:core-3.0-noarch:core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:core-3.2-ia32:core-3.2-noarch
    Distributor ID: Debian
    Description:    Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.7 (squeeze)
    Release:        6.0.7
    Codename:       squeeze
    Caracal:/tmp$  uname -a
    Linux Caracal 3.8.0-tp-22+ #8 SMP PREEMPT Mon Feb 18 23:19:13 PST 2013 i686 GNU/Linux
    cc=gcc 4.4, compiling with glibc.
    Same results with NULL instead of 0.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    389

    Default

    I just tried "fclose(NULL)" on Windows 7 with cygwin GCC 4.5.3 and it doesn't crash.

    Windows, the most reliable operating system on planet.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LightBit View Post
    Windows, the most reliable operating system on planet.
    EXTERMINATE!! EXTERMINATE!!!

    Though ppl seem content on debating FreeBSD vs GNU/Linux, we can all agree one thing.... Windows sucks xD

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    210

    Default

    Actually, Windows is ok. It just lacks preinstalled GNU/BSD tools like sed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •