Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Three Proposals To Consider For Ubuntu Releases

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    470

    Default

    I think the main objective in rolling releases is to bring new models and versions of software faster to the user, without having them wait months before the next release image and risking beta/alpha builds.

    Personally I would like rolling releases, but I would hate having to reinstall my system so much if it wasn't easy to maintain. I never do release updates, I reinstall and merge in my older /etc and home directory.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,599

    Default

    I'm not too thrilled that my 11.04 isn't updated anymore with simple stuff like Firefox, etc. Of course they have to draw the line somewhere.

    On my 12.04 machine I have no intention of upgrading beyond that since each release seems to get crazier and crazier.

    Sometimes I feel like there are too many changes too frequently. It's hard to settle in as a new upheaval is just around the corner.

    It would be better if they just kept third-party packages like Firefox, LibreOffice, video drivers, etc. updated and then maybe updated the Ubuntu-specific stuff and kernel once a year. I think.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    313

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sonadow View Post
    Then why don't YOU install a new distro every 2 months and tell us what it feels like?
    Lol, what?
    Ubuntu releases every 6 months, not 2. Pretty big difference.
    Also you don't have to reinstall, you can upgrade.
    If you thinks 6 months is too often then you should use the LTS
    path, which also is the recommended.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pajn View Post
    Lol, what?
    Ubuntu releases every 6 months, not 2. Pretty big difference.
    Also you don't have to reinstall, you can upgrade.
    If you thinks 6 months is too often then you should use the LTS
    path, which also is the recommended.
    And we all know Ubuntu upgrades always go smoothly... Nice attempt.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pajn View Post
    As you already today have to upgrade to every single initirm release there is no difference.
    And 2 months should be enough for most people to upgrade. A rolling release wouldn't be
    any better either as you need to update every day.

    I hope you know that when you sign up the post count start at zero. If that means that
    you are a troll every one on this forum should be considered trolls. Even though a lot of
    people just seems to be here to complain you shouldn't call everyone trolls.
    No... Don't sidestep what i said... I said lower post count PLUS a clear pro Corporate attitude AGAINST the user... And you DIDN'T sign up yesterday... So, how much is your pay?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •