Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Microsoft Publishes Linux GPU Frame-Buffer Driver

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,780

    Default Microsoft Publishes Linux GPU Frame-Buffer Driver

    Phoronix: Microsoft Publishes Linux GPU Frame-Buffer Driver

    Microsoft's Linux kernel contributions continue... This time around they have published a synthetic frame-buffer driver...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTMwMzg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    49

    Default Move along, nothing to see here.

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: Microsoft Publishes Linux GPU Frame-Buffer Driver

    Microsoft's Linux kernel contributions continue... This time around they have published a synthetic frame-buffer driver...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTMwMzg
    Microsoft has never contributed any code to enhance or improve linux per se - their only contributions have been to enable captive linux instances under microsoft control. That is the only form in which they wish to see linux survive.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,888

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by david_lynch View Post
    Microsoft has never contributed any code to enhance or improve linux per se - their only contributions have been to enable captive linux instances under microsoft control. That is the only form in which they wish to see linux survive.
    Its useful for those who want to use Linux under Hyper-V environments. And from what ive heard Hyper-V is actually fairly nice, besides it doesnt hurt anyone but including the driver. I say let them do whatever they want

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericg View Post
    Its useful for those who want to use Linux under Hyper-V environments. And from what ive heard Hyper-V is actually fairly nice, besides it doesnt hurt anyone but including the driver. I say let them do whatever they want
    Yep...it's not all win for MS, since it makes it easier to run Linux in an otherwise Windows-based environment.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,549

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Delgarde View Post
    Yep...it's not all win for MS, since it makes it easier to run Linux in an otherwise Windows-based environment.
    Indeed. If someone needs to virtualise Linux on Windows, well, they might as well decide to swap places and go for virtualised Windows under Linux later on. Better than not having support in the first place.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    Indeed. If someone needs to virtualise Linux on Windows, well, they might as well decide to swap places and go for virtualised Windows under Linux later on. Better than not having support in the first place.
    Sounds more like an ideal situation to me as having virtualized Windows servers running under Linux would be more stable. If the Windows host crashed or had an issue it could take the Linux instances with it..not ideal. Of course running Linux VM's on top of a Linux host is great too

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3

    Default Have you read the Hyper-V and Windows server EULAs?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericg View Post
    Its useful for those who want to use Linux under Hyper-V environments. And from what ive heard Hyper-V is actually fairly nice, besides it doesnt hurt anyone but including the driver. I say let them do whatever they want
    It may hurt far more than you think or imagine. What does the Hyper-V EULA say about guests? Would the user be required to have a windows license to use the Linux environment under Hyper-V? After all, the Linux guest does "connect" to the Windows Hyper-V system. I would not be surprised to find out that payment is due to Microsoft for each use of Linux in that environment. Maybe this is why they are trying to look like good guys by providing free drivers?

    I would never agree to a Windows EULA of any kind. Most of them grant the vendor the rights to totally mess with your business if they see fit. You are taking on far too serious risk when you choose "I agree".

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3

    Default virtio drivers for windows running virtual below Linux virtualization

    Quote Originally Posted by DeepDayze View Post
    Sounds more like an ideal situation to me as having virtualized Windows servers running under Linux would be more stable. If the Windows host crashed or had an issue it could take the Linux instances with it..not ideal. Of course running Linux VM's on top of a Linux host is great too
    There are very fast virtio drivers available from RedHat for Windows guests running virtualized in KVM/QEMU. The drivers are free to obtain and use.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,549

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zman58 View Post
    It may hurt far more than you think or imagine. What does the Hyper-V EULA say about guests? Would the user be required to have a windows license to use the Linux environment under Hyper-V? After all, the Linux guest does "connect" to the Windows Hyper-V system. I would not be surprised to find out that payment is due to Microsoft for each use of Linux in that environment. Maybe this is why they are trying to look like good guys by providing free drivers?
    Uhm, the user is required to have a Windows license just to use Windows that can run Hyper-V in the first place.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    Uhm, the user is required to have a Windows license just to use Windows that can run Hyper-V in the first place.
    Of course you need a license for each Windows 2008 R2 Hyper-V server, natch

    It appears their current EULA doesn't say what kinds of guests are permitted to run under Hyper-V, but that might change. If they require a CAL for each Linux guest I'll be outraged.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •