Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Intel Ivy Bridge On Linux Properly Supports OpenGL ES 3.0

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,543

    Default Intel Ivy Bridge On Linux Properly Supports OpenGL ES 3.0

    Phoronix: Intel Ivy Bridge On Linux Properly Supports OpenGL ES 3.0

    Intel HD 2500/4000 graphics on "Ivy Bridge" processors now officially support OpenGL ES 3.0 per the Khronos specification. Intel received early word that their conformance results have been certified...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTMwMDg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Just a quick clarification: Intel isn't half a year late here with GLES 3.0 support, this is actually the very first batch of conformance results! Which means we're ahead of all the desktop blob guys for once with a fully open-source GL driver ;-)

    /me sees great times ahead for mesa and opensource gfx

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,024

    Default

    Thr first GLES3-compatible driver was NVIDIA's blob, on Windows and Linux. It's not been certified because seriously, who gives a fuck? Certification from Khronos is worthless. There can still be oodles of performance issues or driver bugs you have to work around for your specific render paths. You still have to test real hardware/drivers; there's no way you can pretend that your game or app will work properly on all "certified" hardware.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    26

    Default

    I am merely an outside observer, but I wonder whether my impression is correct, that progress in Directx is slowing down (due to more and more feature rich-/completeness)? If I am right, this could also mean a slowdown in new OpenGL versions, which in turn would allow for OSS drivers to catch up.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by froyo View Post
    I am merely an outside observer, but I wonder whether my impression is correct, that progress in Directx is slowing down (due to more and more feature rich-/completeness)? If I am right, this could also mean a slowdown in new OpenGL versions, which in turn would allow for OSS drivers to catch up.
    In general this is true. For 2 main reasons:

    1) Gaming is mostly based on Consoles in modern times and Consoles are still in the D3D9/OGL2.1 era. Modern D3D/GL4.x are not being fully used for the moment.

    2) D3D11/Opengl4.x are fairly developed as you noted and while there is still plenty of room for improvement, this improvement will take far more time than in the past when 3D graphics was new ground...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TemplarGR View Post
    1) Gaming is mostly based on Consoles in modern times and Consoles are still in the D3D9/OGL2.1 era. Modern D3D/GL4.x are not being fully used for the moment.
    Ah I see, so I guess that this may change soon due to a new generation of consoles arriving on the market.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    141

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by froyo View Post
    Ah I see, so I guess that this may change soon due to a new generation of consoles arriving on the market.
    Probably not. There isn't anything in the upcoming consoles that hasn't been in PC cards for years. Most games have been sitting at XP/Vista quality simply because most hardware in customer's machines during the PC boom of the past eight years is from the XP/Vista days and not compatible with DX10/11 improvements or is simply too low-end to handle the latest DX tech and the few gaming engines that use it. Low-end/Mid-range cards with no so great performance and not much memory are the norm for most users on PCs and notebooks - especially outside of the US/UK and certain parts of Asia where it's common to see high-end PC builds - and only the high-end GPUs paired with large amounts of GDDR and a nice wide memory bus can really utilize the latest DX tech at high-resolutions. That's one big reason why Valve put out HL on Steam for Linux and hasn't put out HL2, as few Linux desktops and notebooks are packing anything above basic, low-end GPUs that can't handle the high-end tech or gaming engines.
    Last edited by TheLexMachine; 02-15-2013 at 06:06 AM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    26

    Default

    TemplarGR and TheLexMachine, thank you for information!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    53

    Default Serious

    Quote Originally Posted by TheLexMachine View Post
    That's one big reason why Valve put out HL on Steam for Linux and hasn't put out HL2, as few Linux desktops and notebooks are packing anything above basic, low-end GPUs that can't handle the high-end tech or gaming engines.
    I wanted to clarify something: Linux has high end games like Serious Sam 3 that can be played now, can't them?
    http://www.youtube.com/embed/N0sVUFwc9e8

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    53

    Default Serious

    I mean, I haven't tried games like Serious Sam 3, but they are supposed to work well and are high-end games, has anybody tried SS3?

    By the way, the Serious Sam 3 video I was talking about can be seen in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0sVUFwc9e8
    Last edited by Nth_man; 02-16-2013 at 04:38 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •