Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 82 of 82

Thread: John Carmack Pushes Wine For Linux Gaming

  1. #81
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kivada View Post
    Exactly. If it's not native I'm just going to pirate it. Why perpetuate the Windows only stranglehold on the gaming market?

    So far I've bought every single native game for Linux and did the same when I ran Macs. But if the title was Windows only, it was off to the torrent site.
    lol... I didn't mean I would pirate it, just that I wouldn't pay for something for Linux where the publisher was like, "We have a Linux version -- it's called 'good luck with Wine!'"

    If I wanted to play it (like I do with Valve games) I would just get it natively on Windows.

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Goodolandy View Post
    This Carmack fellow seems to have his head up his ass.
    ..snip.... Lets also not forget how some companies, namely Blizzard, have banned players because they misinterrepted their playing through Wine as cheating.
    Two good points. Carmack should know better. Wine is in no state to provide a clean, fast and reliable gaming experience. And it isn't as though people/companies haven't tried (Cross-Over/Cedega anyone?). To bring an acceptable experience in Wine (or any equivalent alternative), you would need to devote development effort because, as I am sure many here would know all too well, getting a Windows game running on Linux via wine is frustrating and often disappointing experience. I would speculate that the long term development effort to Wine as a multi-platform strategy would very quickly surpass native ports.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •