Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 49

Thread: GNU Grep & Sed: Fallout Within The GNU FSF Camp

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BoTuLoX View Post
    One does not simply tease Fallout players with a Linux port in the title without major disappointment after discovering it's not what we thought.
    That's the point. Don't use this word in the future if it's not related to the greatest game ever made, please.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nslay View Post
    If they really wanted to use BSD code, then so be it. It wouldn't affect the existing BSD projects in any way (i.e. they would still be open source).

    BSD code will live on to solve real problems in corporate, government, academic and open source environments (and already has). I mean, imagine the applications of LAPACK and BLAS (used by everyone) for example ... now try imagining the same for GSL.
    LAPACK:
    http://translate.google.com/translat...Fwiki%2FLAPACK
    LAPACK (Linear Algebra PACKage) - Library open source containing solvers main tasks of linear algebra . Written in Fortran using another library BLAS .

    There are also counterparts, maintain or even extend the functionality and provide better performance:

    Intel MKL [1]
    AMD ACML [2]
    Sun Performance Library [3]
    NAG's LAPACK [4]
    HP's mLib [5]

    Some implementations have support for parallel execution of functions on a multiprocessor computer systems with shared memory. Analog computer with distributed memory are libraries ScaLAPACK [6] and PLAPACK [7] .

    Use BSD. Surrender to eternal suckage.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Over there somewhere
    Posts
    239

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kazetsukai View Post
    Here though lies a true statement: Most GUIs that are pleasant to 99.999% of human beings are 99.999% unpleasant to people that actually want to get something real done.
    And 93.051% of all statistics are just made up.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycheese View Post
    LAPACK:
    http://translate.google.com/translat...Fwiki%2FLAPACK



    Use BSD. Surrender to eternal suckage.
    LAPACK is BSD licensed and everyone uses it. Who uses GSL?

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nslay View Post
    LAPACK is BSD licensed and everyone uses it. Who uses GSL?

    I see, you can't read - everyone has forked it and closed it down. Who uses LAPACK except BSD?

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycheese View Post

    I see, you can't read - everyone has forked it and closed it down. Who uses LAPACK except BSD?
    Those specialty ones are for high performance computing. Matlab, for example, still uses the original netlib version (BSD licensed). Don't believe me? Purchase Matlab and look in their library directory. I think octave uses LAPACK and BLAS (also the BSDL versions) also ...

    Nobody uses GSL and why would you? If you're a developer (open source or not) and you want to use your own license ... would you pick GSL to do your math computations? GSL is not free. It's fine if you use GPL though.

    And let's not forget other high impact libraries such as libpng (also BSDL) ...

    EDIT: I'm mistaken, libpng is not BSDL.

    My point is that I suspect that BSDL code (particularly when dealing with libraries) will be preferred over GPL and LGPL code ... and subsequently be more widely adopted and more widely used to solve everything from trivial to big problems.
    Last edited by nslay; 12-26-2012 at 10:16 PM.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    435

    Default

    i vote for the WTFPL licence

    note this topic is not about licences, but about FSF and GNU

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    884

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gens View Post
    note this topic is not about licences, but about FSF and GNU
    Except you can't criticize the gnu bureaucracy on phoronix, which is why gnu grep's and gsed's maintainer stepped down and why gnutls is no longer a part of gnu.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gens View Post
    i vote for the WTFPL licence

    note this topic is not about licences, but about FSF and GNU
    I'm apologize for my digressions.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yogi_berra View Post
    Except you can't criticize the gnu bureaucracy on phoronix, which is why gnu grep's and gsed's maintainer stepped down and why gnutls is no longer a part of gnu.
    by all means bash on
    i'm just saying a license has nothing to do with the organization that made it

    im also the first to say that the FSF way (american way) of doing things is bad for everybody
    at least from what i see is their way

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •