Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Ubuntu Linux Considers Greater Usage Of zRAM

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    234

    Default

    Problem is, there are many anecdotal reports of zRAM boosting system performance, but there is very little in the way of real-world benchmarks... (Michael? Might be a great idea for a future article). Furthermore, there is little consensus as to what the cutoff point is with regards to cpu speed/zRam usage to gain the best performance. Obviously, since zRam uses the CPU to compress memory, it will be faster on faster CPU's; however, does that mean it is a hindrance on slow netbook CPU's or mobile phones where available RAM is generally limited? It would be very interesting to see benchmarks on a whole range of systems utilizing zRam and compare them to similar systems w/o zRam.

  2. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gururise View Post
    Problem is, there are many anecdotal reports of zRAM boosting system performance, but there is very little in the way of real-world benchmarks... (Michael? Might be a great idea for a future article). Furthermore, there is little consensus as to what the cutoff point is with regards to cpu speed/zRam usage to gain the best performance. Obviously, since zRam uses the CPU to compress memory, it will be faster on faster CPU's; however, does that mean it is a hindrance on slow netbook CPU's or mobile phones where available RAM is generally limited? It would be very interesting to see benchmarks on a whole range of systems utilizing zRam and compare them to similar systems w/o zRam.
    There are some benchmark on the project page: http://code.google.com/p/compcache/

    About the benchmarks note that Linux 3.8 will also have a twice faster LZO compressor/decompressor module: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kerne...1915e5ae057826 so numbers may even improve here.
    Last edited by oibaf; 01-03-2013 at 04:25 PM.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,272

    Default

    It's not so much about performance, more about avoiding swapping (or running on systems you previously couldn't). I recall an early Ubuntu livecd test where the CD would crash before desktop on a 256mb ram machine, but with zram it could successfully install. (no swap in that case)

    Since if you swap, performance goes to near zero

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    4

    Default

    zRam has just been enabled as an option in the Raspberry Pi kernel so it will be interesting to see what effect zRam has on these 256MB/512MB devices.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •