Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: The Back Story On The Open NVIDIA Tegra Driver

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,638

    Default The Back Story On The Open NVIDIA Tegra Driver

    Phoronix: The Back Story On The Open NVIDIA Tegra Driver

    New details have been shared with Phoronix about the back-story that led to the work on the open-source NVIDIA Tegra DRM graphics driver that will be introduced in the Linux 3.8 kernel...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTIzODA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    20

    Default So when can we expect a GeForce driver?

    Ok, NVIDIA doing open source drivers is a good thing, but not good enough. When can we expect a desktop driver for GeForce/Quadro cards?

    Why did it take some other company developing their own driver to make NVIDIA understand they CAN and SHOULD do it?

    Will it take another one doing a GeForce driver?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    914

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tundra View Post
    Ok, NVIDIA doing open source drivers is a good thing, but not good enough. When can we expect a desktop driver for GeForce/Quadro cards?

    Why did it take some other company developing their own driver to make NVIDIA understand they CAN and SHOULD do it?

    Will it take another one doing a GeForce driver?
    so 3d is not that importent, but does mean 2d-driver that you can decode hd-videos or will that stay close, if so... nice for your medical usecases or whatever... but will than have no use for consumers...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    731

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackiwid View Post
    so 3d is not that importent, but does mean 2d-driver that you can decode hd-videos or will that stay close, if so... nice for your medical usecases or whatever... but will than have no use for consumers...
    If Nvidia end up (or whoever) improving kernel drivers that are generic. Then everybody who will use new hw will benefit.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackiwid View Post
    so 3d is not that importent, but does mean 2d-driver that you can decode hd-videos or will that stay close, if so... nice for your medical usecases or whatever... but will than have no use for consumers...
    A 2D driver starts with basic hardware initialization, and if they keep it up to date, that would enable a "functional" desktop from where you can choose to install the privative driver (or not). That's always better than a black screen.

    They used to do that with NV, and that basic initialization gave nouveau developers a firs step to use new cards (not much, but now it's even harder), but they caned it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI, USA
    Posts
    884

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackiwid View Post
    so 3d is not that importent, but does mean 2d-driver that you can decode hd-videos or will that stay close, if so... nice for your medical usecases or whatever... but will than have no use for consumers...
    If we have a DRM driver with 2D and video acceleration, that's less stuff that the OSS developers would need to develop (or reverse engineer) themselves. Note, this doesn't mean that Nvidia are never doing a 3D driver for Tegra, just that they haven't done it yet. Maybe they won't do a 3D Open-Source Tegra driver, but maybe they will.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,194

    Default Hope

    I hope open source will be a tradition to be continued for upcoming Nvidia socs in the future such as Tegra 4 and later.

    Thanks Avionic Design!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •