Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: Valve's Steam License Causes Linux Packaging Concerns

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,790

    Default Valve's Steam License Causes Linux Packaging Concerns

    Phoronix: Valve's Steam License Causes Linux Packaging Concerns

    Valve's initial roll-out of their Steam client for Linux is all centered around Ubuntu. With Ubuntu having the largest market-share on the Linux desktop, Valve is focusing upon proper Ubuntu support as their first priority. In the days that the Ubuntu/Debian package has been available of the Steam Linux Beta, it's already been reported to work on other Linux distributions. Some Linux distributions have also begun to package the Steam Linux binary for their own platforms, but now there's some concerns about doing this, at least from the Arch Linux camp...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTIyOTI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    edit:wrong thread

  3. #3

    Default

    What a FUD. You should mention "Arch Linux" in the title of the article, but it wouldn't be so scary, would it?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    87

    Default

    can you PLEASE avoid to say in every Steam news that Gabe hates Windows 8?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    840

    Default

    I tend to think that Steam has ZERO business being in Archlinux's Official repos. It should have been in the AUR, instead. By having it in the Arch User Repository, it could be downloaded directly from valve and then the .deb extracted, installed + any postinstall stuff via the PKGBUILD.

    I'm actually quite surprised Steam would even be considered for the official repos, What's next having AutoDesk Maya 2013 in the official repos? lol.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    64

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ninez View Post
    I tend to think that Steam has ZERO business being in Archlinux's Official repos. It should have been in the AUR, instead. By having it in the Arch User Repository, it could be downloaded directly from valve and then the .deb extracted, installed + any postinstall stuff via the PKGBUILD.
    This is exactly what i thought when i first read the blog entry.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,302

    Default

    goddammit i was in the middle of installing Arch and was excited to try out steam but i guess I'm too late.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    840

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schmidtbag View Post
    goddammit i was in the middle of installing Arch and was excited to try out steam but i guess I'm too late.
    You don't need Archlinux to try Steam. chances are that you can just extract the .deb, have a look through it's contents (ie: look at the dependencies, as you will have to manually install them. look at where all of the files are placed on install and look at the postinst for post-installation commands that will need to be run) and install it yourself (on whatever distro you are using).

    I haven't bothered with Steam, but that is exactly how i got Lightworks to work (which like steam is being tested in Ubuntu and thus is using .deb). But getting it to work outside of Ubuntu took very little effort.

    Quote Originally Posted by glasen View Post
    This is exactly what i thought when i first read the blog entry.
    Ya, it makes no sense that Valve Steam would be in Archlinux repos. It obviously should be in the AUR (where it belongs!).

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    144

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ninez View Post
    I tend to think that Steam has ZERO business being in Archlinux's Official repos. It should have been in the AUR, instead. By having it in the Arch User Repository, it could be downloaded directly from valve and then the .deb extracted, installed + any postinstall stuff via the PKGBUILD.

    I'm actually quite surprised Steam would even be considered for the official repos, What's next having AutoDesk Maya 2013 in the official repos? lol.
    It was in the AUR, but since many people voted for it, so it came into the repos. Whats your problem?
    btw it is still in the repos and imo it should be kept there.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    465

    Default

    How dare commercial entities mess with the distribution specific, totally not the same as walled garden, approach to software distribution and packaging.

    (the walled garden thing is meant sarcastically)
    (Which means distributions are like walled gardens.)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •