Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Shumway: Mozilla Does An Open-Source SWF Runtime

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,089

    Default Shumway: Mozilla Does An Open-Source SWF Runtime

    Phoronix: Shumway: Mozilla Does An Open-Source SWF Runtime

    Mozilla announced Shumway this week, a new research project that seeks to create an open SWF (Adobe Flash) run-time environment to make Flash more open and for exposing SWF capabilities to platforms where the Adobe file-format wasn't backed by an official Flash Player...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTIyODY

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,705

    Default

    WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

    I mean yes flash is a technology still used mainly in pornography websites and websites designed by idiots but it goes away. Mozilla (and google/youtube + porn sites) should start pushing open web formats aggressively (ie not use webm as a fallback and disable it for monetized videos on youtube). Also we should get rid of h264 and shit like that from the web.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    59

    Default

    @89c51

    you are aware of the fact that swf is not a video codec?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,705

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dstaubsauger View Post
    @89c51

    you are aware of the fact that swf is not a video codec?
    Yes the rant was about flash in general. We've seen games in html5 and other funky stuff -even thought i find the "works with chrome" thing utterly stupid.

    We need an open web -yes i know the flash spec was opened and anyone can implement it- thats all.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,098

    Default Porno

    Is it porno-compatible?

    My only use for Flash is porno.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    Is it porno-compatible?

    My only use for Flash is porno.
    Theres a little know site called https://thepiratebay.se/ where you can find all the porn on earth for free and you don't need Flash installed to access it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,024

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    We've seen games in html5 and other funky stuff -even thought i find the "works with chrome" thing utterly stupid.
    Make the other browsers besides Chrome actually be able to run games properly, and that'd go away. We ported some of our HTML5 games work last year, and the speed on Firefox and Safari was just pathetic. It's doubly funny because at the time Firefox was leading the JS performance benchmarks. Problem is, games (and real apps in general) aren't micro-benchmarks, and Chrome devs put a lot of work into optimizing Google's real-world large-scale apps.

    It was doubly confusing since Chrome's <canvas> implementation at the time was pure software, and Firefox had some low-end hardware accel. Either their hardware accel was the usual Open Source 2D rendering quality (e.g., slower than software, because they don't understand GPUs or how to use them for 2D rendering) or V8 really was just that much faster for game code than the competition. Those fun-looking image/audio DSP kernels that Mozilla used to advertise their JS speed ("faster than C!") really have nothing to do with real-world use cases, alas.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Camarillo, CA
    Posts
    72

    Default

    It is extremely annoying to not have flash on my mobile browser, extremely. It basically blocks you from seeing a huge amount of videos and content.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    ฿ 16LDJ6Hrd1oN3nCoFL7BypHSEYL84ca1JR
    Posts
    1,052

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dstaubsauger View Post
    you are aware of the fact that swf is not a video codec?
    I'd estimate 99% of my flash usage is watching videos.

    The sad thing is, that adobe themselves did say that the flash plugin is not for solving the problem of playing videos.
    https://blogs.adobe.com/penguinswf/2..._problems.html

    They still don't seem to realize that (my estimation 95% of users only ever want to watch flash videos with it. They should have made a "flashplugin light" that was only capable of video playback and solving that problem efficiently.
    That would have the advantage of making the flash advertisement garbage go away. Without ads this phoronix article makes chromium consume about 0% CPU on my 3632qm, with flash ads, chromium consumes accumulated about 10 to 20% CPU (of one core). I wonder how much energy humanity could have saved not having flash ads. I mean, not even not clogging the bandwidth with ads, just the client pcs not displaying them.
    Not only do the ads waste energy and bandwidth compared to text ads, they also most often destroy or compromise the layout and are just plain ugly.

    I mean, what the fuck.


    So I would like a flash player that only is capable of playing flash content.

    Maybe the approach of Shumway is modular enough so that you can restrict the code loading to that code that plays videos.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,798

    Default

    I hope you guys know that pr0n is responsible for killing several formats, right? If something's not compatible with porn, it's not going to succeed, even if it's 10 times better than a porn-compatible format. Good examples are Beta vs VHS and HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •