Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: LLVM/Clang 3.2 SVN On Intel Core i7

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,837

    Default LLVM/Clang 3.2 SVN On Intel Core i7

    Phoronix: LLVM/Clang 3.2 SVN On Intel Core i7

    With LLVM/Clang 3.2 being released next month and the code branching occurring this month, here's some new benchmarks from the latest SVN development snapshot as of this weekend. LLVM/Clang 3.2 SVN benchmarks were compared to the earlier LLVM 3.1 and 3.0 releases for reference.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=18102

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    74

    Default

    I guess it won't match GCC for a long while.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kingston, Jamaica
    Posts
    313

    Default No need to post it anymore since I've already posted it for you.

    Obligatory "Clang is a waste of time, let us all contribute too GCC and linux instead as having more than one option is a bad thing except when we are talking about the 697 linux distros which is not a bad thing because choice is a good thing as long as you are choosing linux... Random job at Microsoft and Apple... something about proprietary... crap crap" post.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    945

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jayrulez View Post
    Obligatory "Clang is a waste of time, let us all contribute too GCC and linux instead as having more than one option is a bad thing except when we are talking about the 697 linux distros which is not a bad thing because choice is a good thing as long as you are choosing linux... Random job at Microsoft and Apple... something about proprietary... crap crap" post.
    Usually those who complain about project X being a waste of time also complain that having 697 distros is a waste of time and everybody must come together and... blah blah... Microsoft and Apple.... blah blah blah... nVidia/Intel VS AMD.... blah....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jayrulez View Post
    Obligatory "Clang is a waste of time, let us all contribute too GCC and linux instead as having more than one option is a bad thing except when we are talking about the 697 linux distros which is not a bad thing because choice is a good thing as long as you are choosing linux... Random job at Microsoft and Apple... something about proprietary... crap crap" post.
    I know you're directing this towards the article and Phoronix's often brazen opinions. However, I think it needs to be said that supporting Open-Source projects like Linux/GCC/LLVM is a different, and better thing than supporting, or advocating support, for closed source solutions like Windows & Mac. It's not better out of an emotional or dogmatic appreciation for Linux. It's better because Open-Source projects, by nature, directly benefit the whole of society in tangibly positive and collaborative ways. Linux and other open-source projects are fundamentally not the same as their proprietary cousins, and they deserve a different level of respect.

    Through method transparency, we're acting collectively to benefit the entire population in both utility and education; regardless of social or financial class. Proprietary is imperialistic, Open Source is scientific... it isn't just an alternative, it's the right thing to do. It may be impractical to apply in every situation today, but who knows what the future holds.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    462

    Default

    Run the latest trunk check against a Linux 3.2 kernel.

    I'd be interested in the differences.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    462

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by F i L View Post
    I know you're directing this towards the article and Phoronix's often brazen opinions. However, I think it needs to be said that supporting Open-Source projects like Linux/GCC/LLVM is a different, and better thing than supporting, or advocating support, for closed source solutions like Windows & Mac. It's not better out of an emotional or dogmatic appreciation for Linux. It's better because Open-Source projects, by nature, directly benefit the whole of society in tangibly positive and collaborative ways. Linux and other open-source projects are fundamentally not the same as their proprietary cousins, and they deserve a different level of respect.

    Through method transparency, we're acting collectively to benefit the entire population in both utility and education; regardless of social or financial class. Proprietary is imperialistic, Open Source is scientific... it isn't just an alternative, it's the right thing to do. It may be impractical to apply in every situation today, but who knows what the future holds.
    80%+ of Apple's OS X is open source. LLVM/Clang is all open source, including LLDB, Compiler-RT, Polly, Libc++ and much more.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marc Driftmeyer View Post
    80%+ of Apple's OS X is open source.
    lololololololololololololol

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •