Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: Wayland 1.0 Officially Released

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    353

    Default

    honestly i don't care. the gui on linux is so messed up, it would be like painting a broken car. wayland is trying to solve a problem that doesn't need solving. it is trying to make desktop linux to function properly. this is pointless because the average consumer needs office, itunes, photoshop, blueray, netflix. they are gonna start using linux because stallman lectures them about their freedom. on the server side, you don't even need graphical acceleration. you might as well be running a vesa driver. power users shy from linux too- lacks on apps, sucky multi-monitor support, regressions all over the place, bad power management on laptops.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    571

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garegin View Post
    honestly i don't care. the gui on linux is so messed up, it would be like painting a broken car. wayland is trying to solve a problem that doesn't need solving. it is trying to make desktop linux to function properly. this is pointless because the average consumer needs office, itunes, photoshop, blueray, netflix. they are gonna start using linux because stallman lectures them about their freedom. on the server side, you don't even need graphical acceleration. you might as well be running a vesa driver. power users shy from linux too- lacks on apps, sucky multi-monitor support, regressions all over the place, bad power management on laptops.
    Then fix it already please.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    154

    Default

    Hear Hear! Wayland is here!
    wayland is trying to solve a problem that doesn't need solving.
    Yes it does : when every single desktop has to run a piece of software that isn't used for anything (read X), I'd consider this a problem. Sure it works now, but at what cost (have you ever counted the context switches needed just to move a window?).
    Wayland is about modernizing the linux desktop. X was awesome in its time, still is seeing what we do to it today, even though it only acts as a proxy, only transferring messages between users.

    and the Nvidia propietary drivers? (for example). is compatible with wayland?
    AFAIK that isn't wayland's problem...

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garegin View Post
    honestly i don't care. the gui on linux is so messed up, it would be like painting a broken car. wayland is trying to solve a problem that doesn't need solving. it is trying to make desktop linux to function properly. this is pointless because the average consumer needs office, itunes, photoshop, blueray, netflix. they are gonna start using linux because stallman lectures them about their freedom. on the server side, you don't even need graphical acceleration. you might as well be running a vesa driver. power users shy from linux too- lacks on apps, sucky multi-monitor support, regressions all over the place, bad power management on laptops.
    Well the guys working on Wayland would make neither an office suite, itunes or anything, even if they weren't working on Wayland.
    (At least for office, Wine can take care of that.)
    The average consumer totally needs photoshop and other pro tools, I mean they buy them by the thousands!

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garegin View Post
    honestly i don't care. the gui on linux is so messed up, it would be like painting a broken car. wayland is trying to solve a problem that doesn't need solving. it is trying to make desktop linux to function properly. this is pointless because the average consumer needs office, itunes, photoshop, blueray, netflix. they are gonna start using linux because stallman lectures them about their freedom. on the server side, you don't even need graphical acceleration. you might as well be running a vesa driver. power users shy from linux too- lacks on apps, sucky multi-monitor support, regressions all over the place, bad power management on laptops.
    I never used itunes, photoshop or netflix How about Gummi, Sagemath, Geany, Eclipse, Mencoder/Mplayer etc.?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,766

    Default

    Hooray and props to kristian and all the other devs.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garegin View Post
    honestly i don't care. the gui on linux is so messed up, it would be like painting a broken car. wayland is trying to solve a problem that doesn't need solving. it is trying to make desktop linux to function properly. this is pointless because the average consumer needs office, itunes, photoshop, blueray, netflix. they are gonna start using linux because stallman lectures them about their freedom. on the server side, you don't even need graphical acceleration. you might as well be running a vesa driver. power users shy from linux too- lacks on apps, sucky multi-monitor support, regressions all over the place, bad power management on laptops.
    Ok, I understand that some people have the vision "something doesn't work = everything sucks", but this is just exaggerated, and the lack of those applications isn't linux's fault, or do you really think that some day MS will release office for linux? (gnu/linux, not android obviusly, i mean a linux flavour that you have to install yourself).

    Said this, i hope that Wayland will be ready as soon as possible.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    29

    Default

    Kristian Høgsberg after developing the project the past four years officially announced version 1.0 for Wayland.
    Pfft. That's just way too long...
    Oh well. Just goes to show how bad plumbing is in comparison with plan9.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,261

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garegin View Post
    honestly i don't care. the gui on linux is so messed up, it would be like painting a broken car.
    Of course you care. If you didn't care, you wouldn't comment on a Linux-focused site.
    You don't see me visiting any Windows-focused sites.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    353

    Default

    by i don't care I mean I am not holding my breath.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •