Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: Nine Reasons Mesa 9.0 Is Disappointing For End-Users

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,645

    Default Nine Reasons Mesa 9.0 Is Disappointing For End-Users

    Phoronix: Nine Reasons Mesa 9.0 Is Disappointing For End-Users

    While this morning I shared my views about nine good features of Mesa 9.0 for the major open-source OpenGL user-space update, there's also many disappointing items and shortcomings of this Mesa 9.0 release as it pertains to end-users running the open-source Linux graphics drivers...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTIwMzA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    303

    Default

    Isn't there a saying don't kick a man when he is down... in any case Mesa is much better than AMD's catalyst especially on my laptop's radeon 4200.

    Case in point I can play wine games without artifacts which isn't possible with the proprietary driver. Performance is good enough for many classes of games. FPS games being the main exception. For the most part games don't require high frame rates. If it looked like warmed over pond scum at high frame rates what would be the point.

  3. #3

    Default

    This article seems like a part of bigger issues plaguing Linux.

    It's very nice to see that Michael is not wearing rose-colored glasses.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by birdie View Post
    This article seems like a part of bigger issues plaguing Linux.

    It's very nice to see that Michael is not wearing rose-colored glasses.
    Nice page!

    Linux is far superior for any kind of calculations/programming/documentation on a desktop. If I think of MikTex -.- and TeXnicCentre seems the only viable editor etc. in Windows, no native Python support in a shell (OK, you can install Python in Windows and have a shell, too), no workspaces after ~20 years of development, no Gnome3 etc.

    At least those are some reasons I use it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    ฿ 16LDJ6Hrd1oN3nCoFL7BypHSEYL84ca1JR
    Posts
    1,052

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by birdie View Post
    This article seems like a part of bigger issues plaguing Linux.

    It's very nice to see that Michael is not wearing rose-colored glasses.
    I have only read the first two parts but I already can't take it seriously anymore.

    It's supposed to be the "2012" edition, but...

    1.1 PRIME/DMA-buf?
    2.1 2012 edition. He/She links to SLASHDOT THREADS from 2009 and 2007. WAT
    http://linuxfonts.narod.ru/files/audio.png I don't have experience about pulseaudio + multiuser but I do remember the "linux sucks" talk by datenwolf where he did a live demonstration how consolekit transferred the access rights on a fast user switch. Is the problem that the first user's pulseaudio would still have access even if it technically shouldn't have?

    http://linuxfonts.narod.ru/files/linuxaudio.png No. Just no. At first sight I saw about five programs/libraries that are also available on windows. You have such a headache on windows because you can choose between directly outputting sound to the windows sound architecture or using SDL or openal? Every time someone posts this they don't seem to understand what it means: Most of the items shown are abstractions that are there to faciliate certain things or make sure you don't need to write sound system specific code.

    http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.p...5&cid=39847439 No. That his sound doesn't work (yes, "doesn't work" is his whole description) out of the box with pulseaudio while alsa works is obviously a bug. But he doesn't even know that dmix has been enabled for years now? And then his ranting is incoherent that because everything was still set to pulse it uses still pulseaudio and thus sound mixing worked... So why does it suddenly work now, and how, after he purged pulseaudio? Did he not kill pulseaudio and it was still running from memory? Still, why did it work with pulseaudio now and not before? Sorry, if you rely on incoherent rants that have no reasonable description whatsoever of what the problem is you're gonna have a bad time with me.

    ...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    215

    Default

    Michael, has autumns bad mood cached you when you wrote that article? ;-)

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xeros View Post
    Michael, has autumns bad mood cached you when you wrote that article? ;-)
    More like he's a person who's really interested in Linux becoming a viable alternative to Windows on the desktop, and he gets sick when seeing the current state of affairs.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    315

    Default

    feature list is not all... for me only "bug" hunting matters

    my personal problems right now with oibaf:
    Arma2 in wine crash hard on hd4770.
    kwin 3D desktop in kde crash on a hd3850.(only 2D savemode works)

    maybe its just oibaf i should try mesa9 without freaking git stuff..

    will kubuntu 12.10 get the mesa9 stuff?

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by necro-lover View Post
    will kubuntu 12.10 get the mesa9 stuff?
    Yes, Mesa 9 release is already available in repository.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    315

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by birdie View Post
    More like he's a person who's really interested in Linux becoming a viable alternative to Windows on the desktop, and he gets sick when seeing the current state of affairs.
    Do you really think this? He drive all his favour computers with MAC-OS-X

    But on the other side he earns money on the linux stuff so maybe he care because of the money.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •