Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 39

Thread: AMD "Hondo" APUs May Not Be Too Linux Friendly

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    SuperUserLand
    Posts
    538

    Default

    ARE YOU PEOPLE KIDDING ME?

    "coming later" COMING LATER? AHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA yeah you'd have to be a retard to bet on GETTING ANY support at all from AMD for linux.

    ARe they fkng kidding? after what they have done to radeons and that catalyst BS they expect you to believe their lies???

    "However unlike Intel, AMD said there is nothing stopping people from running Linux on its Hondo processor."

    Yeah well you fucking troll there's also nothing keeping you from running linux on the atomDXXX or on a fucking calculator.

    Be damned AMD, microsoft and intel, these companies need to die, the golden age of ARM is coming the golden age where all the wintel/amd derps will be as relevant as dung beetles.

    I am the future, and all your CANCER and FAIL that is windows and ati will be washed from the face of the earth by ARM.

    I wish the linux community wasn't such a bunch of derps because you would be seeing NO ONE here ever buying your products ever again and everyone focusing on arm development.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    847

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pallidus View Post
    I am the future, and all your CANCER and FAIL that is windows and ati will be washed from the face of the earth by ARM.
    If you show me the free grafics driver that is better than the ones from intel and from amd, I do with you :P

    Sadly arm is even worse than x86 hardware because it seems (or am I wrong) that opensource drivers do not even exist (with 3d and stuff...) Mostly nvidia tegra crap and other stuff... so on paper they look nice but they dont support linux at all (I mean open, only with closedsource shit is not supporting for me...)

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    14

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by boast View Post
    phew! If I had to boycott both AMD and Intel, I'm not sure what other CPU there would be left for me to use!
    http://www.tekmote.nl/epages/6150459...ectID=25471147

    64bit 4core longson 1ghz

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    847

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by necro-lover View Post
    Chipset: AMD RS780E + SB710

    whats the point of this????? thats a amd gpu or am I wrong here? So there is no va-api for that too? and whats the advantage of cpu? is it bios-free aka coreboot or whats the advantage here, if you dont have problems with the very very high price

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    797

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pallidus View Post
    ARE YOU PEOPLE KIDDING ME?
    ...long rant...
    Eh, sure. ARM. Suuuure. Show me the ARM that comes with a mainboard where everything has full specs / free drivers. You probably have no clue about the chips that are usually soldered on these boards. Combined with the ARM CPUs.
    No way, pal.

    Furthermore, ARM is a good idea for a lot of things, but if you need some computing power you're kinda lost with it. Good for mobile devices and more specialized chips, but generic numbercrunching... maybe with a huge farm of them. But a.t.m. you're better with a amd64 multicore and some decent chipset+RAM.
    Also mass storage and useful bus systems that are accessible for users are still extremely rare. No SATA/IDE, no PCI or the like.

    Moreover from a user's perspective there are still more packages on x86 arch than any other. This will change in the future and hopefully one day all arches will be on par package wise (if it makes sense, of course libreoffice doesn't need to be on a headless system) but there will be some water flowing down the rivers until then.


    Aunt Edith screams:
    If it runs Linux kernel, it will also run sooner or later w. Android. They "just" need to adapt the next kernel into their Android-Linux-derviate-Kernel tree or whatever they have there.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackiwid View Post
    Chipset: AMD RS780E + SB710

    whats the point of this????? thats a amd gpu or am I wrong here? So there is no va-api for that too? and whats the advantage of cpu? is it bios-free aka coreboot or whats the advantage here, if you dont have problems with the very very high price
    the point is: these Chinese people are willing to compete with amd/intel in the future.
    right now they do not have a chipset and a gpu right now because of this they use a amd chipset.
    The CPU is real opensource-hardware in the definition of the FSF. (not in the definition of bridgman)
    The bios is 100% open-source.
    Last edited by necro-lover; 09-16-2012 at 08:30 PM.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by necro-lover View Post
    AMD video unit? No blob on MIPS, so you get poor power management and no video decoding. Perfect for a laptop.
    Also there is no USB 3.0 and a maximum of 4GB RAM.
    And that for 860$+taxes. The "Apple in Linux hardware!" must refer to the price.
    Thanks, but no.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
    AMD video unit? No blob on MIPS, so you get poor power management and no video decoding. Perfect for a laptop.
    Also there is no USB 3.0 and a maximum of 4GB RAM.
    And that for 860$+taxes. The "Apple in Linux hardware!" must refer to the price.
    Thanks, but no.
    right but its there second generation hardware..
    there first generation was singlecore only and only a 2D graphic card.
    so its a big step.

    there 3. generation of hardware will have 16cores instead of 4 and more ram and a better graphic card.

  10. #30

    Default

    While I don't give a damn about AMD for now I'm worried: is Microsoft trying to gain monopoly again on the tablet market? Well it may be, but at least this is another obstacle GNU/Linux will have to jump to gain a relevant fraction of the market. Nevertheless the biggest problem is always the same: find an OEM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •