Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 116

Thread: Arch Linux Is Switching To Systemd

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    230

    Default

    This is a decent little read though: http://allanmcrae.com/2012/08/are-we...es-arch-linux/

    I don't think I'm too concerned. Truth be known I did try Systemd on my netbook a month or so ago (on Arch). It was extremely simple to hook up and use, though it didnt make much difference on this hardware. Though I imagine converting to it fully will mean it'll be a bit different to the way I had it installed.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    956

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Sarmiento View Post
    Good luck with that! LOL
    Slackware isn't all that bad..it was the first distro I used in my early days of puttering with Linux back in '94. It took a lot of hair pulling but I got it working pretty nicely after 2 years so been using it for like a total of 10 years

    Last I heard Debian is considering making the switch to systemd too

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    284

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by energyman View Post
    <snip>
    Next step: registry?
    Funny since there already is a "registry". Though desktop specific. Gnome uses gconf (or whatever it's called now) which basically is a registry for Gnome. KDE doesn't have that, rather is has per app configuration files.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    360

    Default

    The problem with systemd is that its again something new to learn and setup (more complicated than rc.conf) to do the exact same thing as before. Id rather not have to do that. But then as all Arch devs seem to be unanimous on this, Ill just have to take the time for it

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,725

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drag View Post
    Luddites tend to be hairy, but don't confuse them with neckbeards.

    Change is cool and technology is cool. Systemd kicks ass, but only if it is setup correctly. Just like Pulseaudio kicks ass, but only if it is setup corrrectly.

    Most distros, in terms of number of distros, don't set it up correctly.

    you kknow what kicks ass? Not using a superfluos sound daemon in the first place.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,788

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by energyman View Post
    Next step: registry?
    Gnome has already switched to a registry for a while now and they run a background process dedicated to it.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    56

    Default

    The next step of computation technology will be to aid in some real ai way. For this to achieve there might be needed some thousands of different services waiting to get in action. Alike to get stoped in an interdependend way. I don't think this can be done via a simple rc file ...

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1

    Default Users loosing control?

    I stopped using my installation of Arch when upgrading offered NO OPTION but to install systemd.

    My experience with other distros using systemd is: If it works you don't even know its there.
    If it doesn't work YOU, the user have little control, or knowledge, of how to fix it.

    My view is that systemd is a complicated solution looking for a problem to fix.
    I had NO PROBLEMS with booting, that I could not fix, until systemd came along.

    If you just use the basic install a distro gives you, likely you won't care about systemd.
    Assuming the distro developers can learn how to setup and use systemd.

    If you are a tweaker, and like to change things, systemd has a LONG way to go before it is usable.
    Perhaps in the future 3rd party developers will produce an interface for humans to control systemd.
    Until that time I still have other options. Debian and slackware to name a couple.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Wow, so much FUD in this thread, just like all the threads in the arch-general mailing list.

    A. You can still use rc.conf, some of the Arch devs have worked hard to make their systemd be able to read the DAEMONS array so no changes necessary, though they are recommended to match upstreadm.

    B. The main selling point of systemd is not speed, though it is much faster. The reason the devs are all so eager to switch is because systemd service files are MUCH easier to write than initscripts. Not only are they much faster to write but they're portable so the hope is upstream will eventually be able to maintain their own service files and the devs jobs will be much easier. People do things that make their lives easier - surprise!

    C. They didn't force you to install systemd, systemd-tools is a collection of small binaries which are useful to any init system - Arch's initscripts make heavy use of them. AFAIK they're still not forcing you, but it will be default and they probably will force you eventually.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,788

    Default

    Another thing about systemd is that it uses the Linux kernel more. Other init systems usually only make use of POSIX calls. Linux-exclusive features are not used at all.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •