Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Mesa Release Shake-Up: Mesa 8.1 Is Now Mesa 9.0

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,793

    Default Mesa Release Shake-Up: Mesa 8.1 Is Now Mesa 9.0

    Phoronix: Mesa Release Shake-Up: Mesa 8.1 Is Now Mesa 9.0

    Well, there isn't a major Mesa release happening this month as was originally planned. There also isn't going to be a Mesa 8.1 release. Instead, Mesa 9.0 will be released in September...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTE1NzU

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    402

    Default

    Now it looks like we're getting there a release early, albeit they still need to catch-up on OpenGL 3.2/3.3 and OpenGL 4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 and GL ES 3.0 before being caught up with the leading proprietary drivers and upstream Khronos specifications.
    PUUUUHLEEEEESEEEE stop stating this EVERY TIME YOU POST AN ARTICLE ON OpenGL version support. It's getting really tiring.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    311

    Default

    So what was wrong with calling the release that enables OpenGL 3.1 Mesa 8.1? I expected Mesa 9.0 would be the one with OpenGL 4.0 and Mesa 10.0 the one with OpenGL 5.0. Are they trying to compete with DirectX on who has the biggest version number?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,676

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ansla View Post
    So what was wrong with calling the release that enables OpenGL 3.1 Mesa 8.1? I expected Mesa 9.0 would be the one with OpenGL 4.0 and Mesa 10.0 the one with OpenGL 5.0. Are they trying to compete with DirectX on who has the biggest version number?
    Numbers don't mean much anyway. They could have named it Mesa 0xB16B00B5.

    Features is where its at.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Will it land into Ubuntu 12.10?

  6. #6

    Default

    89c51: "Numbers don't mean much anyway. They could have named it Mesa 0xB16B00B5"

    LOL

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    Numbers don't mean much anyway. They could have named it Mesa 0xB16B00B5.

    Features is where its at.
    Microsoft might have a copyright for that number... Anyway, for mesa the numbers DO mean something important as the major only increments when a new OpenGL version is implemented.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ansla View Post
    So what was wrong with calling the release that enables OpenGL 3.1 Mesa 8.1? I expected Mesa 9.0 would be the one with OpenGL 4.0 and Mesa 10.0 the one with OpenGL 5.0. Are they trying to compete with DirectX on who has the biggest version number?
    Well Mesa 4 added OpenGL 1.3 support, 5 was OpenGL 1.4 support, 6 was OpenGL 1.5 support, 7 was OpenGL 2.1 support, 8 was OpenGL 3 support. By that reasoning it makes sense that 9 would be 3.1.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    311

    Default

    True, in that context it makes sense. I didn't use mesa before version 6 so I had no idea this was going on for so long. And since version 6 it just happened they bumped it for 2.x and 3.0.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,109

    Default

    Version number bumping has become very popular lately.
    Firefox used to stand for years on 1.x/2.x versions, lately they've been running a major version what seems like every month.
    Linux kernel took the major jump from 2.x to 3.x after sitting on 2.6.x for something like 8 years.
    MS used to slowly increment their 3.x wondoze, then their 4.x, now suddenly they're going from 5 to 6 (visturd), 7, 8 in a matter of no time.

    I think its because stoopid people associate big number jumps with dramatic changes. Not sure why they feel this way.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •