Originally posted by ninez
View Post
So I pointed out that I was used to playing over real analog (pre-)amps which (at least on paper, I fully agree with gamerk2's remark above about 'effectively zero' latency, and as I said, if you get ~1 ms latency on your digital setup, you're past that point already, because yes, that would translate to '34 cm' or something to that effect. Close enough, if you pardon the pun) have lower latency than even the best digital devices today.
I also pointed out that early processors were still partly analog. Eg my first multifx had an analog preamp, coupled with digital reverb/delay and such. So any latency that would occur at all, would only affect these devices (as the device was set up with a parallel effect loop), which meant that even if it would have some latency, it wouldn't really matter anyway.
And are you implying that whenever I use digital processing, I stand infinitely close to my amp? Because I am not quite sure where this strawman-argument of yours is going. By the way, ever heard of (in-ear) monitors?
Comment