Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Wayland Losing OpenWF Display Back-End

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,592

    Default Wayland Losing OpenWF Display Back-End

    Phoronix: Wayland Losing OpenWF Display Back-End

    While an OpenWF back-end compositor for Wayland once provided hope that more hardware would work with Wayland whereby OpenWF Display drivers were available, the OpenWF support is being dropped already from the compositor...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTE1MjE

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    599

    Default

    5:00 AM here so i might be sleeping and making confusion....

    So, it seems that one of the main points of Wayland is being dropped and at same time X Pixman is improved not to mention lately other X improvements....does this start to sound like Wayland might die before it starts and X continue to rule ?

    (AJSB searches for shelter before the artillery hit's him )

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    593

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AJSB View Post
    does this start to sound like Wayland might die before it starts and X continue to rule ?
    I don't see any reason to believe so. The Wayland's developement is faster than ever and X.org is still stuck with the same problems it was few years ago

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    599

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teho View Post
    I don't see any reason to believe so. The Wayland's developement is faster than ever and X.org is still stuck with the same problems it was few years ago
    I was just being a bit provocative of course ....but ok, Wayland is faster than ever....but so is Nouveau and is still is "a million miles beyond " as for performance goes when compared with the NVIDIA blob so....how does Wayland compares about speed against X ?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    683

    Default

    Should be faster, even for X native applications.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    250

    Default

    OpenWF... wouldnt this be something for the distros to invest into?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jakubo View Post
    OpenWF... wouldnt this be something for the distros to invest into?
    It was explained in the mailing list that it was removed because noone was interested in and the guy who developed it doesn't have time to maintain it. They will pull it back in if there is interest.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    459

    Default

    They should still use the specification to inspire their api's though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •