Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: Mid-2012: Arch Linux vs. Slackware vs. Ubuntu vs. Fedora

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    Makes me wonder if it wouldn't be possible to precompile things on a fast machine and then transfer it to the slower one...
    distcc

    (10 chars)

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,666

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gusar View Post
    distcc
    Oh, well, that's handy, thanks. Though it only works after the kernel is in place, I assume, and compiling that still takes a while.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    Oh, well, that's handy, thanks. Though it only works after the kernel is in place, I assume, and compiling that still takes a while.
    As far as I know, you just need networking, and the same version of gcc. Of course, you might need the the kernel recompiled to enable networking, depending on the setup. At any rate, the gentoo handbook has some good documentation on using distcc.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    south east
    Posts
    344

    Default slackware

    That's what you get when one guy does all the work.

    Now maybe everybody can hush and support one distribution. Thanks for the tests!

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    171

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squirrl View Post
    That's what you get when one guy does all the work.


    One BDFL and a team of many.


    Now maybe everybody can hush and support one distribution. Thanks for the tests!
    Only in North Korea...

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    171

    Default

    Looking at the image of system specifications it is at least two different systems (e.g. different sound cards?), making the comparison bogus and the tester suspect.

    Why not run the benchmarks and distros on the same system?

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    209

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    Oh, well, that's handy, thanks. Though it only works after the kernel is in place, I assume, and compiling that still takes a while.

    The genkenrel takes a while to compile, but custom kernels go pretty fast. (hundreds of modules vs a dozen)

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    south east
    Posts
    344

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rallos Zek View Post
    One BDFL and a team of many.
    BDFL Bi-Directional Flowing Linux?

    Not too sure about the team of many, it's one guy. The other guy sends him patches and he meshes them in.

    Two dudes at most.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PeterKraus View Post
    I've used both Gentoo and am still using Arch. While "speed" was really the reason to go to Gentoo (and then move to Arch as I couldn't be arsed recompiling), it has a lot of other benefits compared to other distros.
    Sabayon is Gentoo precompiled, but you can emerge what you want and of course recompile some parts if you wish, and at my desktop computer is faster, but as I do like tests, I want to see Sabayon benchmarks, to see where it is faster or not than others.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gusar View Post
    distcc

    (10 chars)
    distcc's a good way to speed up compilation. Another way is to do it purly on the desktop and rsync with the tablet.

    Run:
    Code:
    gcc -march=native -E -v - </dev/null 2>&1 | grep cc1
    on the tablet to see what flags 'march=native' will give you and:
    Code:
    echo | gcc -dM -E - -march=native
    to get the CPU instruction sets.

    Download a stage 3 tarball and extract it to a new chroot location, put the results of those commands into your C(XX)FLAGS in your make.conf, chroot, and start building your tablet system on the desktop as you normally would. When your done building everything, boot the tablet off a USB stick or something and rsync with the chroot on the desktop.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •