Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: Fedora 18 Will Get 256 Color Terminals

  1. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    I am not telling anyone what he/she should do, but if the stated goal is to get rid of windows on the desktop (and from what I read this seems to be the long term goal), shouldn't we do things that move linux in that direction? I think too much time is wasted on things that do not contribute to that goal. Now we have an opportunity with windows 8 and instead of taking advantage of it we have ubuntu 12.04 which is a buggy mess for example. Is this the alternative that will make people jump ship from microsoft? Shouldn't developers like fix things in ubuntu instead of adding new UIs and other buggy stuff? (I know this is about Fedora but the points still hold. Fedora will not take over anything in the current state)
    I don't think the point holds at all for Fedora. Fedora isn't trying to take over anything and Fedora contributors simply don't have that culture.

    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Overview#Our_Mission

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    I am not telling anyone what he/she should do, but if the stated goal is to get rid of windows on the desktop (and from what I read this seems to be the long term goal), shouldn't we do things that move linux in that direction? I think too much time is wasted on things that do not contribute to that goal. Now we have an opportunity with windows 8 and instead of taking advantage of it we have ubuntu 12.04 which is a buggy mess for example. Is this the alternative that will make people jump ship from microsoft? Shouldn't developers like fix things in ubuntu instead of adding new UIs and other buggy stuff? (I know this is about Fedora but the points still hold. Fedora will not take over anything in the current state)
    Wow... now you really made me curious. Care to provide any citations?

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,498

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RahulSundaram View Post
    Your assumptions don't match reality. If you are passionate about something, you tend to do the tedious work along with the interesting work and for some people, certainly finding out the source of a problem and fixing it can be personally very rewarding. I know I have spend a lot of my own time on such things.
    Ok so the people at Ubuntu aren't passionate about creating a usable desktop.

    Maybe I'll switch to Fedora then.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    I am not telling anyone what he/she should do, but if the stated goal is to get rid of windows on the desktop (and from what I read this seems to be the long term goal), shouldn't we do things that move linux in that direction? I think too much time is wasted on things that do not contribute to that goal. Now we have an opportunity with windows 8 and instead of taking advantage of it we have ubuntu 12.04 which is a buggy mess for example. Is this the alternative that will make people jump ship from microsoft? Shouldn't developers like fix things in ubuntu instead of adding new UIs and other buggy stuff? (I know this is about Fedora but the points still hold. Fedora will not take over anything in the current state)
    Fact is that many [most?] people hate microshit with a passion.
    They are where they are as a direct result of vendor lock-in.

    Vendor lock-in is fading. This is thanks, mainly, to MOBILE platforms, which VASTLY outsell desktops/laptops.

    MSWONDOZE sells at a rate of about 240 million units per year:
    http://www.tomsguide.com/us/windows-...ews-11836.html

    SMARTPHONES 419 million units per QUARTER, of which 56.1% are ANDROID:
    http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=2017015
    419*4*.561=940 million per year.

    And so what we have, is that ANDROID is outselling MSWONDOZE by nearly 4:1.
    And we haven't even added TABLETS into that. Tablets are still a relatively small market, but on their way up STEEPLY.

    Here is where it starts to become really fun;
    Smartphones and tablets are at a point now where even a fairly mediocre device is at least as powerful as a desktop/laptop computer of just a few years ago (i.e., around the age of wondozexp --> the last RELEVANT version of mswondoze). So why do you need to duplicate equipment? Connectivity between smartphones/tablets and other devices is increasing quickly, including support for peripherals, like MONITOR, KEYBOARD, and MOUSE. Combined with a trend toward "cloud computing", and an increase in the sophistication of software available to run on mobile devices, the desktop/laptop is becoming less and less important. Get to the office or home and snap your phone into the cradle on your desk, and there you have it -- a complete computer! The needs for software are already making it to the point where software vendors are beginning to build their software specifically for those mobile platforms.

    Believe me, desktop Linux is NOT what is going to kill mswondoze on the desktop. The desktop ITSELF is being killed.

  5. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    Yes I knew that, but the idea was that this type of behaviour isn't happening just in fedora but also in ubuntu and a lot of other projects which are trying to take over the world.
    I don't get your point. You cannot direct volunteers with a list of priorites that you are interested in. Open source project management is more like herding cats. People will work on whatever they are interested in and you can broadly oversee that and bring some rigor. Beyond that, you dont get to dictate or micro manage everything.

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by johnc View Post
    Ok so the people at Ubuntu aren't passionate about creating a usable desktop.

    Maybe I'll switch to Fedora then.
    I think it is simplistic to view it in terms of distro X vs distro Y. If you want to be guaranteed of things, you have to pay for it. Otherwise, whatever bugs gets fixed depends on who is working on it and how much free time they have and whether they can coordinate with others to get things fixed etc.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    Wrong! Wrong! WRONG!!!

    We have limited resources. Meaning there is not an infinite pool of programmers with infinite time to do everything. Thus we invent the concept of focus. Right now Ubuntu number one bug is windows has majority of desktop. So we must focus on fixing that. Windows 8 will most probably be a clusterfuck. Let's take advantage of that. For now we must focus on the glaring problems of linux and right now graphics support is a major issue. So programmers should focus on that. Instead of having one idiot creating the 30000th quake 3 engine, another adding 256 colors to terminal and one writing graphics drivers maybe we should have 3 writing graphics drivers, get it? The time is limited. Windows 8 will be an opportunity for people to jump to linux. People should learn FOCUS! Once the graphics is solved they can FOCUS on another problem in order of priority. If you come to linux you see what the problems are, learn the apis and everything necessary to contribute and then contribute. Don't write the bilionth cat command in lisp or whatever you like at this moment!
    As much as I agree with you on having many applications that are 98.76% identical instead of a few but with more support, things don't really work that way... (especially when you and I don't pay the big salaries to actually have a say in what people do)

    1- You think that graphic drivers are THE problem now. Does everyone agree? Apart from power management there is nothing I need for my desktop's graphic stack and I don't care that much, as for my laptop it has everything I need in that regard. Are they other non-graphic related features I would want/need? Oh yes...
    Also a mass of professionals moving to nix distributions would be a good, it does not have to start at home, I do not believe that is how DOS and Windows started either... How many of them need a better graphic stack vs something else? I am not sure if your argument is so strong anymore...

    2- Based on your comments I doubt you work in the software industry.
    One clear thing is that happy people produce more. If it made some devs happier to get their terminal like this and it got them happier / proud to push that to the outside world, they may very well produce more in the long run (irrespectively of their income actually).
    Also as someone said earlier about different people with different skills, you can also get a better return when people work on things they are passionate about rather than being forced to...
    The downside is the lack of focus, therefore eventually the big guys in charge of a distribution have to make the big calls, but that does not mean ignoring everyone's feelings for the ONE goal of one person...

    3- Finally it could even be an investment for what you want. (no clue if true, just a thought here): having a better dev environment also leads to a better return. If some of the graphics devs get an improved work experience through this change, you may be very happy about it as well.

    Smile!

    /End

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    945

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by geearf View Post
    Smile!
    I think this says it all. And don't forget to breathe as well!

    To BO$$ and others, if you enjoy the linux world and it fits your needs then use it and if you think something is wrong you can try to engage with the developer responsible. What you can't do is say what developers (as a group) should or shouldn't do because in the open source world there isn't really a boss to order people around. There can be groups or individuals that have some influence on their own project, but the operating system as a whole is the result of multiple minds coming together to produce something. There are cases of companies governing the direction of some distros, but even then there is a lot of free range.

    Don't worry. As long as there are geeks the world won't come to an end

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rural Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,030

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    Yes I knew that, but the idea was that this type of behaviour isn't happening just in fedora but also in ubuntu and a lot of other projects which are trying to take over the world.
    Pinky: "Gee, Brain, what do you want to do tonight?"
    The Brain: "The same thing we do every night, Pinky—try to take over the world!"


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •